Collaborate in Entrepreneurial REvolution of Pro-Youth Economics
Join the million new economics thinkers of tomorrow-
Pro_youth and Open Society Economists: Dad started this genre 42 years ago after student experiments with digital networks
- archives The Economist and this summary of texts of Entrepreneurial Revolution since 1972 including the search for 30000 community replicated microfranchises central to 3 billion new jobs of sustaining net generation and valuing massive open collaboration- help Macrae Foundation collaboration projects search out 100 leading investors in next decade being worldwide youth's most productive at www.wholeplanet.tv and call for the peoples open education summits at microeducationsummit
- Innovating beyond big brotherdom: key challenge checklist (1972-1988) if generation prior to net genre were not to systemically destroy freedoms and futures of youth
2013 Winner of The Economist's 1976 competition for biggest change to 20th organisational systems is bottom-up NGO. 10 characteristics of bottom-up ngo .where next?
1.1 Differences and similarities between Bangladesh's networks: BRAC & Grameen
proposal draft to BRAC on how to make competition for top 100 nine-minute training modules that millions of youth most need to interact to create jobs
Value multipliers: Massive Open Online Collaboration/Course/Curriculum
Which MOOCs will scale and maximise the human possibilities of the net generation – why are collaboration treasure maps configured around 9 minute audio training modules millions of youth most need to interact
|
ER 1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 |
x
3.0 Understanding why Keynes warned youth to be terrified of old economists as the designers of the future
3.1 Whole Truth: Understanding how Einstein-Gandhi,-Montessori also concluded ruling top-down professions become greatest threat in times of unprecedented worldiwde cange
3.1 Soros’ 30 most valued leaders at Inetworkeconomics & Open Society- rethink economics from ground up before it bankrupts youth everywhere
3.2 ER’s checklist- which of these 20 anti-youth monopolies is destroying your nation’s future freedoms
3.3 Hunt for multi-win models way above zero-sum defining issue of human sustainability in global village borderless age- professions used to global profiting from separation assumptions put human race at greatest compound risk of being exinguished by natures rules
chris macrae
Help us to describe trillion dollar purposes of global markets that sustain youth futures locally
Food retailing, manufacture and agriculture
Optimalise nutrition not junk- secure health during first 1000 days of infants (end nurseless vilages and thereby empower women too)
Optimalise local food security
End poverty by freeing knowhow of crop science , irrigation etc so that each food's value chain sustains/empowers hard working producers however small
Impact neighbouring markets to food producing which include
(machine) energy- clean renewable zero-waste abundancy
financial services, and sustainable property rights and policies
health services and education,
mediating public service and whole truth professions including pro-youth economics - the latter includes preventing failure of nations and spreading peace across a borderless world
celebrating mobile technology where food can help end digital divides and build open society networks and human sustainability
Asians have led this possibility since 1960s -eg with Japan sharing knowhow of 10 times more sustainable rice production. Bangladesh has become the greatest rural laboratory for all of the above. Wherever places wish youth to enjoy growing futures, open learning of the above is urgent . Further, so that Asia can play the fullest role in open society it is critical we celebrate china learning from all the best for youth community-grounded cases that eg Japan and Banglaldesh have open sourced and mobilised more than most nations as 2010s enters 2nd worldwide generation of collaboration technology exponentially accelerating
Pro-youth economic regional contributions linked to The Economist include
consider japan from 1962
consider asia pacific century from 1975
consider china
consider millennium goals of emerging worldwide youth generations
consider bangaldesh
While the US food market retailer Whole Foods aims to improve the nutrition of wealthy american shoppers its worldwide programs integrated ending agricultural poverty wherever it has long-term sourcing relationship; it is leading the transformation debate on the nutrition of school lunches in usa; and it is inviting ceos who value a pro-youth purpose of their sector to benchmark who their organisational networks can media this
FREEING THE TEACHERS AS WELL AS THE CHILDREN TO EXPLORE SUSTAINABILITY OF FOOD
The visibility of ceo whole purpose networks -and their ability to change place leaders and democracy itself depends on transformations in media and education. Imagine if MOOCs on purposeful network maps of food were freely online and food literacy curricula were transformed for every age group and translated sustainably to every locality's natural permutation of conditions and sustainability challenges. Is that something the purpose of the internet could have socially mediated.
Jul 31, 2013
chris macrae
Open source models are critical to saving the world with1) clean energy and by 2) ending poverty
I trust that there are few if any more urgent apps oF how knowledge can multiply value in networked youth's open use than clean energy and ending poverty.
Ironical are the consequences of Mr Neville Williams (long America's and the world's number 1 champion of solar) and Dr Yunus
DR Yunus multiplied the knowledge Neville gave him by going home and building a network of 1000 barefoot energy professionals demanding similar lifelong dedication that he had demanded from thousands of barefoot bankers from the official opening of Grameen bank in 1983
By 2006 , the grameen energy business was taking off after a lot of patient improvement of the franchise, ad energy must have been one of the apps yunus was thinking of in his national plan for bangladesh growing up with neighbouring giants especially china. The plan called from swaps- grameen would swap its clean energy and end poverty network with china in turn fo bangladesh economy being a favored Chinese partner in the region
But then a lot of personal relationships got conflicted with yunus sacking one of his 4 founding partners.
Today nothing could be more important to grassroots Chinese and bangldeshi youth than open and fast replication of microenergy franchises but China doesn't have the will to help yunus out with his enemies in bangladesh government, so the doubling of grameen china clean energy has never got going. Meanwhile back in Williams USA the 5 million green jobs promised by Obama was never invested in due to refinancing banks that Obama was wrongly advised as too big too fail
LOOK TO CLEAN ENERGY MOOCS to linkin youth in ways that even the redoubtable Dr Yunus appears not to have the remit to action
Jul 31, 2013
chris macrae
ER1- Entrepreneurial Revolution's Core Question: What would happen if economics and organizational designs valued maximising win-win interactions between peoples working lifetimes
The Economist's pro-youth economist started debating this question ... by explaining that it wopuld involve the revolution of assuming that the 20th century's largest organsiational typologies could not sustain the net generation. Futhermopre many short-term fixes made by macroeconomists especially those that were responses to world wars woruld need to be erased so that deeper win-win systems could be mapped. As Einstein showed the definition of any tue science is that when it runs out of innovation space, you need to referame the rules at more micro levels of nteraction . That''s also what nature does as the world's greatest micro-up and openly collaborative modeler. Man shouldn't forget that is if we value our species being sustainable.
related links on who took most risk over last 20 with youth's futures : 1 2
.Who else every addressed this?
Theoretically: Keynsians followed up his last 5 page conclusion to general theory on how old macroeconomists were youth's greatest enemy; von hayek explained why national government economics would only haste Big Brothers along the Road to Serfdom; schumpeter explained how governments were the worst in world dynamic for raedily co-creating with open technology; schumacher listed all the anti-sustainabiulity rules old economists have chained us to
Breaking through the top 20 anti-yout monopolies will need practice leaders but systems valuing the above sorts of microeconomic collaborations
Drucker' open knowledge co-working models were congruent with my father's but completely over-ridden by those who coined knowledge management to be the exact opposite movement to value open learning multipliers and flows linking in peoples productive lifetimes. Soros inet demanding economics is re-thought from the ground up is the most positive 2010s dyamic especialy when wined with his older open society "people freedom" networks
Practically.. Wherever Asian miracles have stood the test of time , we can hunt out system design that are more win-win and bottom up - see the hunt for microfranchises; help us rate which entrepreneur networks are positively aligned with ER; This also suggests why Asian aimks to free MOOCS may have more value than Californi's yhough yoith can hope that they win-win
1 become interconnected
2 start to scale networks whose ompound impacts rival natures
1 NATIONS MUST NOT HAVE A MONOPLY ON RULING ECONOMICS
Let us suppose your value in life depends on exchanging unique knowhow and how it can connect good around the world. That means your virtual productivity side may be much more valuable to you than what you can exchange only with people you physically meet. That would suggest you need minimal (national) borders not ones that assumes growth depends on adding up separate nations outputs
2 The greatest multipliers in knowlhiw connecting world come from how knowledge can multiply value in use unlie the scarcity caused by consuming up things. Implication 1- you should valiue win-win with key partners not how much profit you extract from them. 2 as von Neumann discussed, in a networked age st patent should be permitted for no more than 3 months. This is because anyone genuinely value multiuplying leading ege knowledge would find 3 months lead in shaping networks around progressing that value multiplication more than enough.
3 The prevuous iussue leads to open source atents. What an originator of knowhow doesn't want is someone else liaming to apply theor knowhow but to opposite ends. So the definition of 21st c social media needs to be that whoch stands up for the person who open sourcs knowledge primarily to build win-wins with societies exspecaully pro-youyth win-wins with the greatest human challenges millenniu goals can collaboratively agree. In other wprds social media would voralise free publicity if a souce was mainily open sourcing best for the world knowhow ; other media could charge those who were pursuing zero-sum models
And all of these ideas point to how so much may depend on what knowhow we first make open free online- why should the best job creating knowhow be available free to study -see eg the moocyunus challenge
Aug 1, 2013