265SmithWatt 75Neumann 55.YunusAbed , AI20s.com JHDHFL 20
KingCharlesLLM DeepLearning009 NormanMacrae.net EconomistDiary.com Abedmooc.com
Search Results - korea
- Comment on: Topic 'will korea help unite humans and deep learning ai'
- ai its notable that s korea is a world leader in engineering other chose not to focus on nuclear acccording to US CSIS now vital to closing us energy gaps Exporting technology: South Korea is recognized for its expertise in nuclear technology and exports its reactors to other countries. shipbuilding - 80% of world trade is sheipped- and remains the ecological core of trade according to gemini today these are areas of AI that Koprea is a world leader in AI Hardware: Korea is a major player in the global semiconductor industry, producing cutting-edge processors and memory chips essential for powering AI systems. This strong foundation in hardware provides a crucial advantage in AI development. 5G and Telecommunications: Korea was one of the first countries to launch 5G networks, offering high-speed connectivity that is critical for AI applications like autonomous vehicles, remote surgery, and real-time data analysis. AI Education and Research: Korea invests heavily in AI education and research, with numerous universities and research institutions conducting cutting-edge AI research. This strong focus on education and research fosters a skilled workforce and drives innovation in the AI field. AI in Manufacturing: Korean companies are leveraging AI to automate manufacturing processes, improve efficiency, and enhance product quality. This includes the use of robotics, machine learning, and computer vision in various industries. AI in Healthcare: Korea is exploring the use of AI in healthcare, such as developing AI-powered diagnostic tools, personalized medicine, and remote patient monitoring systems. To find more specific information, you can: Search online: Use search engines like Google, Bing, or DuckDuckGo to search for terms like "Korean AI leadership," "AI in Korea," or "Korean AI companies." Consult research reports: Many research organizations publish reports on AI trends and developments, including those specific to Korea. Visit the websites of Korean AI organizations: Explore the websites of Korean AI research institutions, government agencies, and industry associations. I asked gemini about expectations on korea leading on data soveregnty and agency Strong Government Support: The Korean government has demonstrated a strong commitment to AI development, with initiatives like the "AI Korea" strategy aimed at fostering a robust AI ecosystem. This support can translate into policies that prioritize data sovereignty. Technological Advancements: Korea is a leader in technology, particularly in areas like 5G and semiconductors, which are crucial for edge computing and AI infrastructure. These technological advancements can be leveraged to build a strong foundation for data sovereignty. Focus on Data Privacy: South Korea has a relatively strong data privacy framework, which is a crucial component of data sovereignty. Continued refinement of these regulations can further enhance data protection and control. Growing AI Ecosystem: Korea has a thriving AI ecosystem with a growing number of AI startups and research institutions. This vibrant ecosystem can drive innovation in AI technologies that support data sovereignty, such as federated learning and homomorphic encryption. However, challenges remain: Global Competition: The global landscape for AI is highly competitive. Korea will need to maintain a competitive edge in AI research and development to remain a leader in the field. Data Access and Availability: While Korea has made strides in open data initiatives, ensuring the availability of high-quality data for AI development remains a challenge. Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Striking the right balance between fostering innovation and ensuring data privacy and security will be crucial for Korea's success in AI and data sovereignty. In conclusion: South Korea has the potential to be a leader in data sovereignty and AI agency. By leveraging its technological strengths, fostering a strong AI ecosystem, and implementing effective data protection policies, Korea can position itself as a global leader in the responsible development and use of AI. South Korea is emerging as a significant player in the development of autonomous AI, particularly in the areas of: Autonomous Vehicles: Government Support: The Korean government has heavily invested in developing autonomous driving technologies, including infrastructure and testing facilities. Industry Involvement: Companies like Hyundai and Kia are actively involved in autonomous vehicle research and development, with plans to commercialize self-driving cars in the coming years. Robotics: Industrial Robotics: Korea is a global leader in industrial robotics, with a strong presence in manufacturing automation. This expertise is being leveraged to develop more advanced, AI-powered robots. Service Robotics: Korean companies are also developing service robots for various applications, including healthcare, logistics, and elder care. However, it's important to note that: Global Competition: The field of autonomous AI is highly competitive, with major players like the United States, China, and Europe investing heavily in research and development. Challenges: Significant challenges remain in developing truly autonomous AI systems, including safety, ethical considerations, and regulatory hurdles. Overall: While South Korea may not yet be considered a "leader" in all aspects of autonomous AI, it is a strong contender with significant potential. Its strengths in technology, government support, and a thriving AI ecosystem position it well for future advancements in this field. oth Korea and Taiwan possess strong AI capabilities, making them potential partners in AI education, particularly at the K-12 level. Strengths of Korea: Strong in AI Hardware: Korea is a global leader in semiconductor manufacturing, producing cutting-edge processors and memory chips crucial for AI systems. This provides a strong foundation for AI development. Focus on AI Education: The Korean government has invested heavily in AI education and research, with numerous universities and research institutions conducting cutting-edge AI research. This fosters a skilled workforce. AI in Industry: Korean companies are leveraging AI in various sectors, including manufacturing, healthcare, and telecommunications. Strengths of Taiwan: Semiconductor Dominance: Taiwan is home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world's largest contract chip manufacturer, giving them a significant advantage in the AI hardware landscape. Strong in ICT: Taiwan boasts a robust information and communications technology (ICT) industry, providing a solid foundation for AI development and applications. Focus on High-Tech Manufacturing: Taiwan excels in high-tech manufacturing, which can be significantly enhanced through AI-powered automation and optimization. Potential for Partnership: Complementary Strengths: Korea's strengths in AI hardware and software development could complement Taiwan's dominance in semiconductor manufacturing. Shared Challenges: Both countries face similar challenges in AI education, including developing a skilled workforce and integrating AI into the K-12 curriculum. Joint Research: Collaboration on AI research and development, including joint research projects and student exchange programs, could accelerate progress in both countries. Reasons for Partnership: Enhanced Competitiveness: A strong AI ecosystem benefits both countries by enhancing their global competitiveness in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. Access to Talent: Collaboration can facilitate the exchange of talent and expertise, fostering a more dynamic and innovative AI research environment. Addressing Global Challenges: Joint efforts can be directed towards addressing global challenges such as climate change, healthcare, and education, leveraging AI for the betterment of society. Potential Challenges: Competition: While cooperation is beneficial, competition between the two countries in certain AI sectors may arise. Data Sharing: Concerns about data privacy and security could hinder seamless data sharing for joint research projects. Geopolitical Factors: Geopolitical tensions between China and Taiwan could indirectly impact the scope and nature of the partnership. Overall: Despite potential challenges, a strong partnership between Korea and Taiwan in AI education and research holds significant promise. By leveraging their respective strengths and addressing potential concerns, both countries can benefit from increased collaboration and contribute significantly to the advancement of AI globally.…
- Added by chris macrae at 2:50pm on December 13, 2024
- Comment on: Topic 'ai celebrating greatest (ie most good for 8 bn beings) human intelligences (195…'
- last month it was mentioned that the national ai safety format would continue with next hosts likely to be s kore and france; it will be interesting watching ai people from these 2 asian countries; in this regard bard suggests tracking researchers like these in hope their will be breakthroughs I did find that the following South Korean organizations were partners of the summit: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) Korea Institute of Information and Communications Technology (KICT) Korea National Police Agency (KNPA) National Information Society Agency (NIA) It is likely that representatives from these organizations attended the summit. In addition, the following South Korean companies were sponsors of the summit: Samsung Electronics LG Electronics SK Telecom Naver Kakao Seong-Whan Lee: Professor at Seoul National University, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI). Byung-Wook Jeon: Professor at KAIST, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute at the Korea Institute of Information and Communications Technology (KICT). Seungjin Choi: Professor at Yonsei University, Director of the Center for Artificial Intelligence Research at the National Information Society Agency (NIA). Jinwook Kim: Professor at Korea University, Director of the Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Research Center at the Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT). Young-Suk Park: Professor at Pohang University of Science and Technology, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at LG Electronics. Daewon Lee: Professor at Sogang University, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at Naver. Sungyoung Park: Professor at KAIST, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at Kakao. These are just a few examples of the many talented AI researchers working in South Korea. These individuals are making significant contributions to the field of AI, and they are helping to position South Korea as a leader in this important area. It is difficult to say definitively whether any of these individuals are from KISTI or KICT. However, it is likely that some of them are affiliated with these organizations, as they are both major research institutes in South Korea that focus on AI. Overall, South Korea has a strong contingent of AI researchers who are making significant contributions to the field. These individuals are helping to position South Korea as a leader in AI, and they are likely to play an important role in shaping the future of this technology. Do any of these people have partnerships with anyone at stanford? Yes, some of the South Korean AI researchers listed above have partnerships with researchers at Stanford University. For example, Seong-Whan Lee, who is the Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at KISTI, has collaborated with Stanford researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new machine learning algorithms and the application of AI to medical imaging. Byung-Wook Jeon, who is the Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute at KICT, has also collaborated with Stanford researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for natural language processing and robotics. In addition, Seungjin Choi, who is the Director of the Center for Artificial Intelligence Research at the NIA, has partnered with Stanford researchers on a project to develop new AI-powered methods for detecting and preventing fraud. These are just a few examples of the many partnerships that exist between South Korean AI researchers and Stanford researchers. These partnerships are helping to foster collaboration and exchange of ideas between the two countries, and they are helping to advance the field of AI research. Overall, South Korea and Stanford have a strong relationship in the field of AI research. This relationship is beneficial to both countries, as it allows researchers to share ideas and collaborate on projects. It is likely that this relationship will continue to grow in the future, as both countries continue to invest in AI research. recently japan and s korea seem to have bene sharing more with each other - is there a leading ai person in japan who has best connections with s korea? Yes, there are a few leading AI people in Japan who have strong connections with South Korea. One such person is Masayoshi Tomioka, who is a Professor at the University of Tokyo and the Director of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Intelligent Systems Research Institute. Tomioka has collaborated with a number of South Korean AI researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for robotics and natural language processing. Another leading AI person in Japan with strong connections to South Korea is Yuji Matsumoto, who is a Professor at Kyoto University and the Director of the AI Research Center at the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT). Matsumoto has also collaborated with a number of South Korean AI researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for machine translation and information retrieval. In addition, Junichi Tsuda, who is a Professor at the University of Tokyo and the Director of the Center for Advanced Intelligence Project (AIP), has strong connections to South Korean AI researchers. Tsuda has collaborated with South Korean AI researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for computer vision and medical imaging. These are just a few examples of the many leading AI people in Japan who have strong connections to South Korea. These individuals are helping to foster collaboration and exchange of ideas between the two countries, and they are helping to advance the field of AI research in both countries. Overall, Japan and South Korea have a strong relationship in the field of AI research. This relationship is beneficial to both countries, as it allows researchers to share ideas and collaborate on projects. It is likely that this relationship will continue to grow in the future, as both countries continue to invest in AI research. …
- Added by chris macrae at 10:28am on November 9, 2023
- Topic: will korea help unite humans and deep learning ai
- 2025 lasy weels csis korea in 2025 barely mentioned ai lets hopw next weeks kennan center wilso horea afternoon does beter - its comnvemnor recentl;y wrote thios Integrating AI into Korea's economy Posted : 2024-09-12 10:50 Updated : 2024-09-12 10:50 By Troy Stangarone Since the debut of ChatGPT in late 2022, generative AI has been viewed as a key component for economic growth and technological development. How best to integrate this new technology, however, is the key challenge faced by companies and countries alike. Despite the hype behind AI, companies have yet to fully adopt generative AI. With any new technology, it takes time for companies to implement and best utilize the technology. However, generative AI comes with additional challenges. It has a tendency to “hallucinate,” meaning to make up data, raising questions about its reliability. In a New York legal case, for example, AI created a fictional legal precedent in the brief it generated. For a country like Korea, the challenge could be even more difficult. The large language models that underpin generative AI models such as ChatGPT require enormous amounts of data to train. While ChatGPT has used publicly available data on the internet, it and other leading AI companies have also worked to integrate proprietary data into their models. It is unclear whether Kakao or Naver can compete with Google, Meta or Microsoft, which supports ChatGPT, in a competition for data. It is also unclear if building ever-larger large language models is a viable path forward for AI. The world’s most advanced generative AI models have already absorbed much of the world’s available data. Firms are now increasingly turning to synthetic data — data created by AI itself — to fill the data gap. However, a recent study in Nature found that because of the compounding of errors from using synthetic data, AI systems risk collapsing if trained on increasingly larger amounts of synthetic data. Without a new technological breakthrough, generative AI based on large language models will face limits on its development. On a more basic level, companies face a cost-benefit calculation. Generative AI is generally presented as a way to address a wide range of tasks. However, as Erik Hoel, an American neuroscientist, has pointed out, because large language models need immense amounts of data to train, they are best at skills where data is plentiful. These also tend to be low value-added areas. From a corporate perspective does it make sense to replace low-wage workers with higher-cost technology for skills that are widely available? This suggests for generative AI to be successful it needs to begin providing higher-value skills or improve the productivity of workers in higher-level tasks. This basic challenge could provide Korean firms and Korea more broadly a path forward for integrating AI into the economy. Rather than viewing generative AI as a means to replace workers, a better approach is asking how AI can help workers become more productive and avoid the hallucination and potential collapse issues related to large language models. This involves focusing on more specialized models. Specialized AI models tend to have lower levels of hallucinations. The data used to train the models is higher quality and often possesses fewer errors than consuming publicly available data on the internet. Google’s DeepMind provides an example of how specialized models can produce higher value data. Last year, it discovered 2.2 million potential new crystalline structures, of which 380,000 are considered the most stable. By traditional methods, this would have taken 800 years. These new crystalline structures could provide breakthroughs to improve semiconductors or EV batteries. This approach would also help Korean firms maintain a competitive edge in these industries. More broadly utilizing AI to improve or develop new products would enhance productivity in ways that would justify significant investments in AI. Korea’s own demographic challenges may also give it an advantage in developing advanced AI models. One promising area for developing AI is robotics. Because robots learn from their interaction with the real world, they produce their own data for learning and have fewer limits on consumable data. They are only constrained by their interactions. Declining birthrates have pushed Korean firms to integrate more industrial robots into production. Integrating AI with industrial robots could provide Korea with a way to develop high-value advanced AI, but also aid in improving the productivity of small and medium-sized firms (SMEs). Based on data from 2019, SMEs are only 32 percent as productive as large firms in Korea. Boosting productivity in SMEs would significantly improve Korea’s overall economy. Korea already plays an important role in the advancement of AI due to the development of high-bandwidth memory. Without these chips, Nvidia’s graphics processors would not be able to power AI models to the degree they have. However, for Korea to move beyond being a hardware partner for AI and to integrate the technology more broadly into its economy, it will need a different approach focused on specialized models for research and development, along with integration into robotics. Troy Stangarone is the director of the Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy and the deputy director of the Indo-Pacific Program at the Woodrow Wilson Center. i welcome mai8l chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk FC regions 2025report.com ai20s.com www.economistdiary.com www.ecopnomistjapan.com asia rising since 1962 - von neumann quizzes since 1951 …
- Added by chris macrae at 10:10am on December 3, 2024
- Topic: why not celebrate every chinese leaders support of global village development paradigm
- he international community should advocate security and co-operation, "so as to turn the global village into a big stage for common development rather than an arena where gladiators fight each other". China is North Korea's only ally and major trading partner, but has grown increasingly frustrated with North Korea's bellicosity. Mr Xi did not name North Korea directly, but said that "no-one should be allowed to throw the region, or even the whole world, into chaos for selfish gains".…
- Added by chris macrae at 8:10am on April 7, 2013
- Comment on: Topic 'sme yellow pages - across 13 Belt Road maps'
- koreas http://www.eugene-bell.org/ steve linton mdr tb dr kj seung 12 treatment centes n korea nhk film 9/10/18
- Added by chris macrae at 4:38am on September 10, 2018
- Comment on: Topic 'KIng Charles AI World Series'
- ews/uk-and-republic-of-korea-to-build-on-legacy-of-bletchley-park all to play for around safety report edited by bengio- this will show which of the 3 oroginal algorithm professor still able to keep up with rapidly innovating maths lecun seems to be positive player out of new york and only one with a contract from leading digital company metaverse bengio and lecun share summer retreat in canada students - hopefully this will keep bengio interested in ai saving the world by being connected to best human intelligences see www.friends20.com hinton retired to london would seem to be deeply exposed compared with world leading contributions of hassabis to climate and life sciences praised by leaders in these sectors and making the crown estate scence park in cambrdge together with london one if the west's few world epicenters that can keep up with the valley and asian american ai immigrants now desperately trying to keep millennials ai world leaping forwatd round renewable intergenerational investments Press releaseUK and Republic of Korea to build on legacy of Bletchley Park UK and Republic of Korea forging ahead with plans for the AI Seoul Summit on 21 and 22 May. From: Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street, and The Rt Hon Michelle Donelan MP Published 12 April 2024 Leading AI nations to join two days of talks at AI Seoul Summit on 21 and 22 May summit will address capabilities of frontier AI models and further commitments from developers on AI safety talks to also focus on promoting innovation and how the technology’s benefits can be shared equally The UK and the Republic of Korea are forging ahead with plans for the next wave of global discussions on the safe development of Artificial Intelligence, with the AI Seoul Summit set for 21 and 22 May. The summit will spearhead discussions on AI safety, addressing the potential capabilities of the most advanced AI models, building on the Bletchley Declaration and wider agreements which were reached at the AI Safety Summit in the UK last November, which included commitments from developers on AI safety. Countries will also gather for talks on how the technology can be made more inclusive, ensuring the benefits and opportunities of AI are shared equally – and how attendees can further advance innovation. AI innovations have already helped to realise important breakthroughs in areas such as healthcare and drug discovery, and is being used to increasing effect in other settings such as education and tackling climate change. Day one of the AI Seoul Summit will see a virtual leaders’ session co-chaired by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Republic of Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol. A select number of global industry leaders will also be invited, to update on how they are fulfilling the commitments made at Bletchley Park to ensure the safety of their models. This comes ahead of an in-person meeting of Digital Ministers on the second day, which is co-hosted by UK Technology Secretary Michelle Donelan, and Korean Minister of Science and ICT Lee Jong-Ho. Next month’s summit continues the legacy of the Bletchley Park discussions, capitalising on its momentum to once again bring international governments, AI companies, academia, and civil society together to advance the global AI safety agenda. This next round of talks comes at a critical time for the technology, with increasingly capable and advanced AI models expected to be released over the course of 2024. UK Science, Innovation, and Technology Secretary, Michelle Donelan said: The summit we held at Bletchley Park in November was a generational moment. We agreed the historic Bletchley Declaration and have ensured discussions around AI safely are firmly on the international agenda. If we continue to bring international governments and a broad range of voices together, I have every confidence that we can continue to develop a global approach which will allow us to realise the transformative potential of this generation-defining technology safely and responsibly. I am looking forward to building on the ‘Bletchley effect’ with this next round of talks in the Republic of Korea, who are perfectly placed with their rich history of technological innovation to advance the global conversation on AI safety. Minister Lee Jong-Ho of the Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea said: The AI Safety Summit held in Bletchley, UK last year marked a milestone in which the government, industry and academia coming together to address the potential risks of AI, and I am pleased that the Republic of Korea takes the baton from the UK. AI is advancing at an unprecedented pace that exceeds our expectations, and it is crucial to establish global norms and governance to harness such technological innovations to enhance the welfare of humanity. We hope that the AI Seoul Summit will serve as an opportunity to strengthen global cooperation on not only AI safety but also AI innovation and inclusion, and promote sustainable AI development. Innovation is a particular focus for the UK’s overall approach to AI, with projects such as the Manchester Prize marking a decade-long commitment of £1 million every year by the government to tap into the technology and advance solutions to pressing challenges such as climate change and energy efficiency. The UK continues to drive forward international collaboration on AI safety through the AI Safety Institute – the world’s first state-backed body dedicated to AI safety. The Institute has already published a detailed approach to model safety evaluations, rapidly expanded its researcher ranks, and earlier this month put pen to paper on an historic agreement with the United States on AI safety. The AI Seoul Summit will be accompanied by the release of the first iteration of the International Scientific Report on Advanced AI Safety – a key commitment from the Bletchley Park Summit which is being independently led by Turing Prize winner Yoshua Bengio and brings together the best existing scientific research on AI safety from across the globe. The international expert review panel for the report includes representatives from the UK, the Republic of Korea, and other leading AI nations. The UK will continue to work closely with international governments, AI companies and civil society, to ensure people across the globe can safely realise the transformative benefits of AI to unlock new opportunities, transform productivity and public services, and power economic growth. Notes to editors Further details on summit attendees will be announced in due course. The virtual Leaders’ session on day one ‘Building upon the AI Safety Summit: towards an Innovative and Inclusive Future’ will deepen the consensus on AI safety while also focusing on broader aspects of global AI governance around innovation and inclusivity. Talks on day two will be held in Seoul, and ministers will discuss ways to ensure AI safety and explore ways to foster the sustainable development of AI. The AI Seoul Summit is the latest international summit on AI safety, kickstarted at Bletchley Park last November and continuing with a further planned summit in France over the next 12 months. Ahead of the AI Seoul Summit the UK has appointed Imran Shafi, Director of AI Policy at the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology, and Henry De Zoete, the Prime Minister’s adviser on Artificial Intelligence, to spearhead preparations. Approaches to AI should complement a country’s existing strengths, which is why the UK has cemented its regulatory approach in the wake of the discussions at Bletchley Park. In February, the government published its response to the AI Regulation White Paper consultation. Share this page The following links open in a new tab Share on Facebook (opens in new tab) Share on Twitter (opens in new tab) Published 12 April 2024 Explore the topic Artificial intelligence World locations South Korea …
- Added by chris macrae at 2:21pm on May 2, 2024
- Topic: BR1 East of China including Japan Korea superports and Asean
- S had chance to reboot as economies in mid 20th century- their superb civil, electronic and quality engineering led eastern hempishere into win-win world trades reversing centuries of colonisation and giving rise to chinese diaspora superports - singapore taiwan hong kong- by 1975 japan was number 2 economy and china diasspora 3rd wealthiest financial network- their inward investment and win-win trades with china's mainland are the most joyful and sustainablity defining opportunity of millennials and all parents alive today. China is the only massive continental space with smart 21st c infrastructure- a benchmark for every continents Roads and Belts to learn from, and go green with. IN 2018's 50th year of Entrepreneurial Revolution reporting, it is evident that 80% of the sustainability generation's livelihoods are collaborative not competitive- lets hope the west is just-in-time to learn this (people-centric economics) future rising with the east, 14%20surveys%20on%20global%20peoples.pptx In 2020 Ma's sponsordhip of Olympics is a chance for the world as well as the whole region to come together -now is time for hugher level of Sono-Japan-Korean friendhsip if sustainability is the goal- , and these nations can sets the stage for best chance ever oif transformation of N korea. Jack Ma 1 talks of happiness markets such as health education green energy, active cultural communities as ones that cant be reached directly by ecommerce platforms but will be reached if we choose to celebrate them and also change from dismal fake media to joyful true media Without the founder of Japa';s Softbank it is unclear whether Jack Ma would ever have found an optimal investor- ali baba has major youth entreprebnur funds across chinese superports; it has established the testing of EWTP through Malaysia. In terms of optimistic tech possibilities BR1 seems second only to china itself- as one of the 3 big "direct" neighbor compasses of China it has similar needs as China in seeing prosperous/sustainabiiuty futures develop with the huge population of S Asia BR2 and the huge lands and gateway to arctic belt of Russia Extraodunary Leadership of the Late Great Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore- extraordinary university until recently led by Mahbubani- author of the eyeopening trilogy : on asean can asians thins has ameruca lost it Thanks to singapore's lead the poorer nations of asean set extraodinary transcultural examples. Singapore is arguably the most pivota coordinate on all Belt Road Mapping with Suex-Med route to the west north and the route round africa to east coast latin america, and of course routes to south pacific's commonwealth nations of Australia and New Zealand More than 6/10 of the world's population live in the eastern hemisphere BR0-1-2 - the rest if the worlds youth should be encouraged to friend the East which is where opportunities to transform our species sustainability are now irrevocably linked EconomistDiary.com JIm KIm finally hosts a world bank annual summit in the east- indonesia Oct 2018 and has opportunity to celebrate with aiib billion dollar loan to indonesia to end slums- and issues world development report on future of ,livelihoods- for a long time now china and world bank have shared synergetic ideas on future of cities and future of health that all the world's youth should be free to access…
- Added by chris macrae at 1:57pm on August 14, 2018
- Comment on: Topic 'economic freedom and 2 questions every public broadcaster should ask about whic…'
- nomic freedom over the last 10 years and the small business heroes at the epicentre of such races to freedoms - this is a future capitalism curriculum I would love to celebrate and value as integral to every youth's freedom of speech and education chile was a leading example accompanied by Zambia and slovakia -and a fascinating case of a north korean expatriate who escaped to south korea and whose venture capitalism bank is investing in his expatriates in south korea with the hope that when north korea falls they will have enough capital and knowhow to quickly train up their peoples please tell me ((or all of us) if you feel we could collaborate in do the following )1 could you in chile start a blog freechile where you list the favorite cases of bernardos or other youth entrepreneur curriculum - you dont need to tell the full story but in which sectors has a small business leader committed to a unique purpose which made the whole sector better for society- please include the case featured was a bey keeper -apparently and I still dont know how to analyse this up to a third of all plants depend on cross-fertilisation by bees - so healthy bees are a way to ensure local food security - what youth need and nobel peace laureates to know is that there is a space for connecting every case that is the opposite pf to-d-down mba cases - part 2 of the bees case gets more virally wonderful in recent years big foods industry started destroying bees so this chilean bee-keeper has also become a world leader in breeding queen bees- apparently these he is allowed to export to Europe but not to the macro-agri-monooplistic USA- incidentally according to the canadians who keep a worldwide monitor, USA has fallen faster than any country in economic freedom since 2008 which shows exactly why youth will need to turn the tide by atlanta 2015 if american youth are to be free to collaborate with worldwide net generation's greatest purposes for humanity 2 if we could start with say 5 cases that chile has freedom benchmarks to share with youth around the world, we could try and start up a series of blogs edited mainly by youth in countries (or regions) whose economic freedom has advanced most since 2000- and this series of blogs under the free<nation> name could become one of the most valuable commons resources in the whole future of open education of hi-trust entrepreneurship 3 urgent twin jobs capitals diaries; may I note the following diary of attempts to help america youth free economies- 3.1 in 4 days time the first ever totally new curriculum on coursera appears edited put of a university in connecticut - http://coursera.com/course/changetheworld - its cases are claimed all to come from last september's un and mashable social good conference in new york; what would be real cool is if in the discussions section of this course we can swarm free-nation bloggers through a post cataloguing where these youth journalists of job-creation are co-editing from - what other swarms are needed to- for example is one member of every conscious capitalism chapter registered for this course and ready to communally linkin through one discussion post- if not how can it seriously claim to be a youth economic collaboration network? 3.2 in 15 days time the second annual term of collaboration students across 5 states bordering dc begins with a discussion of how can such youth free conscious capitalism and vice versa - ask king or sylvia for more details 3.3 towards entrepreneurial revolution's dream curriculum of open jobs creating education - free nation blogs would syndicate a common sidebar with next events where youth can co-create and openly franchise the sorts of cases pbs celebrated last night 3.4 back to chile- getting a few photographs on the home of world class queen bee production can fit a roving youth gallery of the natures wonders and horrors - as many of you know clara's worldwide campaigns to value plastic properly include opportunities for youth to share the most horrific plastic waste photos choking waterways etc - the american tv age was all about using photography to image over communities most urgent sustainability challenges- its time photographers and youth for humanity pictorially struck back- we are hoping mostofa will soon have some good news on this as yunus official photographers of the last 30 yeras shares his ideas on ways to connect this- mostofa will also be visiting the world's largest single situated school and can find out if photographers for humanity is one of their student networks (it is interesting to note how moocs and khan academies dont yet use the world's most telling photos in helping students action learn- coursera will be dead in the water unless it does find such a way to include open 24/7 content and not just content that appears once a year and asks you not to collaboratively multiply knowhow around it (dear me john doerr -you really dont get the web's most economic multipliers do you- quite a pity since my father's earliest survey on silicon valley celebrated networks around you including what was then the coming of sun microsystems and java) cheers chris macrae wash dc 1 301 881 1655 skype chrismacraedc…
- Added by chris macrae at 7:28am on January 15, 2014
- Comment on: Topic 'it worlds most exciting curricula - number 1 the Rice Race'
- nsion systems, helping IRRI’s research reach where it is needed the most. The nations below play a vital role in sharing our research and adapting our technologies to their local conditions and needs. This broadens our reach and multiplies our impact. Bangladesh Bangladesh’s partnership with IRRI goes back more than 45 years. IRRI's first outreach program in Bangladesh was in 1965 -- when a set of 303 rice varieties, which constituted the Institute's first international rice testing program, was evaluated at Savar Farm, a government-run dairy enterprise. This was with support from the Ford Foundation. The following year, the first widely distributed high-yielding semidwarf rice variety, IR8, was introduced into the country. Continue Reading Cambodia As a result of food shortages in the late 1970s, many farmers were forced to eat their rice seed and traditional varieties were lost. In the 1980s, IRRI reintroduced more than 750 traditional Cambodian rice varieties to Cambodia from its seed bank in the Philippines—a vivid demonstration of the foresight that created the bank in the 1960s. Continue Reading India IRRI-India's success began with the introduction of high-yielding rice variety IR8 dubbed "miracle rice," which helped save India from a massive famine in the 1960s. Continue ReadingIran Iran and IRRI's collaboration started in 1976, and IRRI scientists have since visited Iran to monitor existing projects in the country and several work plans have also been signed to support these collaborations and capacity-building partnerships. Continue Reading Mozambique Mozambique has a 500-year old tradition of rice cultivation. Today, rice is seen more as a cash crop. Most of the farmers produce rice, but don’t eat it. IRRI was first established in Mozambique in 2006 with a mandate to increase rice production and build capacity to sustain the country’s rice industry. Continue Reading Nepal Cooperation between the government of Nepal and IRRI began in 1985. This covers research on improvement of rainfed lowland and irrigated rice varieties, plant pathology, entomology, soil science, agronomy, and farming systems. Continue ReadingPhilippines IRRI has a special relationship with the Philippines, the country having been its home since the Institute’s founding in 1960. Continue Reading Sri Lanka Rice is famed to have had a long and regal history in Sri Lanka. Its importance goes far beyond its status as a primary food source in this island nation. Synonymously, rice plays an important role in the country's cultural identity, tradition, and politics. Continue Reading Vietnam The Socialist Republic of Vietnam and IRRI have been partners since 1963, in a wide range of collaboration in the fields of rice breeding material exchange, rice varietal improvement, resource management, and capacity building. Since then, a total of 89 IRRI breeding lines have been released as varieties in Vietnam. IRRI varieties now cover 70% of the rice-growing areas in Vietnam. Continue Reading Burundi Rice has become an important crop for Burundi, which increased its rice production by 316% between 1984 and 2011. In 2010 Burundi was importing about one-third of its rice and making efforts to further increase production. IRRI has been officially collaborating with Burundi since 2008. Continue Reading China IRRI and China have been collaborating for more than 30 years. A key partnership was in a mega-project which began in 1997, intensively focused on rice research and training. This huge undertaking of 12 collaborative projects resulted in 49 super rice varieties being released in China since 1999. Yields increased to as much as 12 tons per hectare. Continue Reading Indonesia Indonesia’s rice consumption in 2010 was more than 139 kilograms per capita per year and is among the highest in the world. IRRI estimates that Indonesia will need 38% more rice in the next 25 years, which means that the average yield of 4.6 tons per hectare must rise to more than 6 tons per hectare to fill the gap. Continue Reading Lao PDR Lao PDR-IRRI collaboration began in the late 1960s and the first memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Lao PDR and IRRI was signed in 1987. Continue Reading Myanmar Since 1965, IRRI has been involved with Myanmar researchers, extension personnel, and farmers in introducing rice breeding material, hybrid rice technology, and locally adaptable designs for rice transplanters and threshers. The rice variety IR8 was introduced in Myanmar in 1967. It was called Ya Gyaw, meaning “more than a hundred.” Continue ReadingPakistan IRRI began its first initiative in Pakistan in 1966 when the Ford Foundation decided to fund IRRI directly to hire rice specialists. It was through this arrangement that Kenneth Mueller was hired as a rice specialist to lead the Pakistan accelerated rice production project. Continue Reading South Korea Through the Rural Development Administration (RDA), the Republic of Korea (commonly called South Korea) has been collaborating with IRRI since the 1960s to breed the temperate Japonica rice variety with the tropically grown indica variety. Continue Reading Thailand As far back as 1941, Thailand recognized the importance of deepwater rice research by building the Huntra Rice Experiment Station. The first formal link between Thailand and IRRI was made in 1960-1963 when Prince M.C. Chakrabandhu became a founding member of the IRRI Board of Trustees. Continue Reading …
- Added by chris macrae at 2:05pm on September 24, 2014
- Comment on: Topic 'Alumni of Macrae EconomistDiary @175'
- es a nation's youthTECH depend on ownership of finTECH 6-3-0 From ARC to BARCC Are G7 nations mentally and constitutionally uncapable of celebrati... ER's 50th year of sustainability's league of nations …
- Added by chris macrae at 8:43am on July 2, 2018
About
ENTREPRENEURIAL REVOLUTION NETWORK BENCHMARKS 2025now : Remembering Norman Macrae
2025REPORT-ER: Entrepreneurial Revolution est 1976; Neumann Intelligence Unit at The Economist since 1951. Norman Macrae's & friends 75 year mediation of engineers of computing & autonomous machines has reached overtime: Big Brother vs Little Sister !?
Overtime help ed weekly quizzes on Gemini of Musk & Top 10 AI brains until us election nov 2028
unaiwho.docx version 6/6/22 hunt for 100 helping guterres most with UN2.0
RSVP chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Prep for UNSUMMITFUTURE.com
JOIN SEARCH FOR UNDER 30s MOST MASSIVE COLLABS FOR HUMAN SUSTAINABILITY
1 Jensen Huang 2 Demis Hassabis 3 Dei-Fei Li 4 King Charles
5 Bezos Earth (10 bn) 6 Bloomberg JohnsHopkins cbestAI.docx 7 Banga
8 Maurice Chang 9 Mr & Mrs Jerry Yang 10 Mr & Mrs Joseph Tsai 11 Musk
12 Fazle Abed 13 Ms & Mr Steve Jobs 14 Melinda Gates 15 BJ King 16 Benioff
17 Naomi Osaka 18 Jap Emperor Family 19 Akio Morita 20 Mayor Koike
The Economist 1982 why not Silicon AI Valley Everywhere 21 Founder Sequoia 22 Mr/Mrs Anne Doerr 23 Condi Rice
23 MS & Mr Filo 24 Horvitz 25 Michael Littman NSF 26 Romano Prodi 27 Andrew Ng 29 Lila Ibrahim 28 Daphne Koller
30 Mayo Son 31 Li Ka Shing 32 Lee Kuan Yew 33 Lisa Su 34 ARM 36 Priscilla Chan
38 Agnelli Family 35 Ms Tan & Mr Joe White
37 Yann Lecun 39 Dutch Royal family 40 Romano Prodi
41 Kramer 42 Tirole 43 Rachel Glennerster 44 Tata 45 Manmohan Singh 46 Nilekani 47 James Grant 48 JimKim, 49 Guterres
50 attenborough 51 Gandhi 52 Freud 53 St Theresa 54 Montessori 55 Sunita Gandhu,56 paulo freire 57 Marshall Mcluhan58 Andrew Sreer 59 Lauren Sanchez, 60 David Zapolski
61 Harris 62 Chips Act Raimundo 63 oiv Newsom. 64 Arati Prab hakarm,65 Jennifer Doudna CrispR, 66 Oren Etsioni,67 Robert Reisch,68 Jim Srreyer 69 Sheika Moza
- 3/21/22 HAPPY 50th Birthday TO WORLD'S MOST SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY- ASIAN WOMEN SUPERVILLAGE
Since gaining my MA statistics Cambridge DAMTP 1973 (Corpus Christi College) my special sibject has been community building networks- these are the 6 most exciting collaboration opportunities my life has been privileged to map - the first two evolved as grassroots person to person networks before 1996 in tropical Asian places where village women had no access to electricity grids nor phones- then came mobile and solar entrepreneurial revolutions!!
COLLAB platforms of livesmatter communities to mediate public and private -poorest village mothers empowering end of poverty 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
4 livelihood edu for all
3 last mile health services 3.1 3,2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
last mile nutrition 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2,6
banking for all workers 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
NEWS FROM LIBRARY NORMAN MACRAE -latest publication 2021 translation into japanese biography of von neumann:
Below: neat German catalogue (about half of dad's signed works) but expensive -interesting to see how Germans selected the parts they like over time: eg omitted 1962 Consider Japan The Economist
feel free to ask if free versions are available
0 The coming entrepreneurial revolution : a survey - In: The economist 261 (1976), pp. 41-65 cited 105
. we scots are less than 4/1000 of the worlds and 3/4 are Diaspora - immigrants in others countries. Since 2008 I have been celebrating Bangladesh Women Empowerment solutions wth NY graduates. Now I want to host love each others events in new york starting this week with hong kong-contact me if we can celebrate anoither countries winm-wins with new yorkers
mapping OTHER ECONOMIES:
50 SMALLEST ISLAND NATIONS
TWO Macroeconomies FROM SIXTH OF PEOPLE WHO ARE WHITE & war-prone
ADemocratic
Russian
=============
From 60%+ people =Asian Supercity (60TH YEAR OF ECONOMIST REPORTING - SEE CONSIDER JAPAN1962)
Far South - eg African, Latin Am, Australasia
Earth's other economies : Arctic, Antarctic, Dessert, Rainforest
===========
In addition to how the 5 primary sdgs1-5 are gravitated we see 6 transformation factors as most critical to sustainability of 2020-2025-2030
Xfactors to 2030 Xclimate XAI Xinfra Xyouth Wwomen Xpoor chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk (scot currently in washington DC)- in 1984 i co-authored 2025 report with dad norman.
|
Asia Rising Surveys
Entrepreneurial Revolution -would endgame of one 40-year generations of applying Industrial Revolution 3,4 lead to sustainability of extinction 1972's Next 40 Years ;1976's Coming Entrepreneurial Revolution; 12 week leaders debate 1982's We're All Intrapreneurial Now
|
The Economist had been founded in 1843" marking one of 6 exponential timeframes "Future Histores"
IN ASSOCIATION WITH ADAMSMITH.app :
we offer worldwide mapping view points from
and these viewpoints:
40 years ago -early 1980s when we first framed 2025 report;
from 1960s when 100 times more tech per decade was due to compound industrial revolutions 3,4
1945 birth of UN
1843 when the economist was founded
1760s - adam smithian 2 views : last of pre-engineering era; first 16 years of engineering ra including america's declaration of independence- in essence this meant that to 1914 continental scaling of engineeriing would be separate new world <.old world
IF we 8 billion earthlings of the 2020s are to celebrate collaboration escapes from extinction, the knowhow of the billion asian poorest women networks will be invaluable -
in mathematically connected ways so will the stories of diaspora scots and the greatest mathematicians ever home schooled -central european jewish teens who emigrated eg Neumann , Einstein ... to USA 2nd quarter of the 20th century; it is on such diversity that entrepreneurial revolution diaries have been shaped
EconomistPOOR.com : Dad was born in the USSR in 1923 - his dad served in British Embassies. Dad's curiosity enjoyed the opposite of a standard examined education. From 11+ Norman observed results of domination of humans by mad white men - Stalin from being in British Embassy in Moscow to 1936; Hitler in Embassy of last Adriatic port used by Jews to escape Hitler. Then dad spent his last days as a teen in allied bomber command navigating airplanes stationed at modernday Myanmar. Surviving thanks to the Americas dad was in Keynes last class where he was taught that only a handful of system designers control what futures are possible. EconomistScotland.com AbedMooc.com
To help mediate such, question every world eventwith optimistic rationalism, my father's 2000 articles at The Economist interpret all sorts of future spins. After his 15th year he was permitted one signed survey a year. In the mid 1950s he had met John Von Neumann whom he become biographer to , and was the only journalist at Messina's's birth of EU. == If you only have time for one download this one page tour of COLLABorations composed by Fazle Abed and networked by billion poorest village women offers clues to sustainability from the ground up like no white ruler has ever felt or morally audited. by London Scot James Wilson. Could Queen Victoria change empire fro slavemaking to commonwealth? Some say Victoria liked the challenge James set her, others that she gave him a poison pill assignment. Thus James arrived in Calcutta 1860 with the Queens permission to charter a bank by and for Indian people. Within 9 months he died of diarrhea. 75 years later Calcutta was where the Young Fazle Abed grew up - his family accounted for some of the biggest traders. Only to be partitioned back at age 11 to his family's home region in the far north east of what had been British Raj India but was now to be ruled by Pakistan for 25 years. Age 18 Abed made the trek to Glasgow University to study naval engineering.
- 7 Middle East & Stans
- 8 Med Sea
- 9 Africa
- 10 Latin Am /Carib
- 11 Arctic Circle
- 12 UN
1943 marked centenary autobio of The Economist and my teenage dad Norman prepping to be navigator allied bomber command Burma Campaign -thanks to US dad survived, finished in last class of Keynes. before starting 5 decades at The Economist; after 15 years he was allowed to sign one survey a year starting in 1962 with the scoop that Japan (Korea S, Taiwan soon hk singapore) had found development mp0de;s for all Asian to rise. Rural Keynes could end village poverty & starvation; supercity win-win trades could celebrate Neumanns gift of 100 times more tech per decade (see macrae bio of von neumann)
Since 1960 the legacy of von neumann means ever decade multiplies 100 times more micro-technology- an unprecedented time for better or worse of all earthdwellers; 2025 timelined and mapped innovation exponentials - education, health, go green etc - (opportunities threats) to celebrating sustainability generation by 2025; dad parted from earth 2010; since then 2 journals by adam smith scholars out of Glasgow where engines began in 1760- Social Business; New Economics have invited academic worlds and young graduates to question where the human race is going - after 30 business trips to wealthier parts of Asia, through 2010s I have mainly sherpa's young journalist to Bangladesh - we are filing 50 years of cases on women empowerment at these web sites AbedMOOC.com FazleAbed.com EconomistPoor.com EconomistUN.com WorldRecordjobs.com Economistwomen.com Economistyouth.com EconomistDiary.com UNsummitfuture.com - in my view how a billion asian women linked together to end extreme poverty across continental asia is the greatest and happiest miracle anyone can take notes on - please note the rest of this column does not reflect my current maps of how or where the younger half of the world need to linkin to be the first sdg generation......its more like an old scrap book
how do humans design futures?-in the 2020s decade of the sdgs – this question has never had more urgency. to be or not to be/ – ref to lessons of deming or keynes, or glasgow university alumni smith and 200 years of hi-trust economics mapmaking later fazle abed - we now know how-a man made system is defined by one goal uniting generations- a system multiplies connected peoples work and demands either accelerating progress to its goal or collapsing - sir fazle abed died dec 2020 - so who are his most active scholars climate adaptability where cop26 november will be a great chance to renuite with 260 years of adam smith and james watts purposes t end poverty-specifically we interpret sdg 1 as meaning next girl or boy born has fair chance at free happy an productive life as we seek to make any community a child is born into a thriving space to grow up between discover of new worlds in 1500 and 1945 systems got worse and worse on the goal eg processes like slavery emerged- and ultimately the world was designed around a handful of big empires and often only the most powerful men in those empires. 4 amazing human-tech systems were invented to start massive use by 1960 borlaug agriculture and related solutions every poorest village (2/3people still had no access to electricity) could action learn person to person- deming engineering whose goal was zero defects by helping workers humanize machines- this could even allowed thousands of small suppliers to be best at one part in machines assembled from all those parts) – although americans invented these solution asia most needed them and joyfully became world class at them- up to 2 billion people were helped to end poverty through sharing this knowhow- unlike consuming up things actionable knowhow multiplies value in use when it links through every community that needs it the other two technologies space and media and satellite telecoms, and digital analytic power looked promising- by 1965 alumni of moore promised to multiply 100 fold efficiency of these core tech each decade to 2030- that would be a trillion tmes moore than was needed to land on the moon in 1960s. you might think this tech could improve race to end poverty- and initially it did but by 1990 it was designed around the long term goal of making 10 men richer than 40% poorest- these men also got involved in complex vested interests so that the vast majority of politicians in brussels and dc backed the big get bigger - often they used fake media to hide what they were doing to climate and other stuff that a world trebling in population size d\ - we the 3 generations children parents grandparents have until 2030 to design new system orbits gravitated around goal 1 and navigating the un's other 17 goals do you want to help/ 8 cities we spend most time helping students exchange sustainability solutions 2018-2019 BR0 Beijing Hangzhou:
Girls world maps begin at B01 good news reporting with fazleabed.com valuetrue.com and womenuni.com
.==========
online library of norman macrae--
==========
Ma 2 Ali Financial
- 1972's Next 40 Years ;
- 1976's Coming Entrepreneurial Revolution; 12 week leaders debate
- 1982's We're All Intrapreneurial Now
- What will human race produce in 20th C Q4? - Jan 1975
- (1984 book on net generation 3 billion job creation) ...
- 1991 Survey looking forward to The End of Politicians
- 1975 Asian Pacific Century 1975-2075
- 1977 survey China
- first of 4 hemisphere remembrance parties- The Economist Boardroom
health catalogue; energy catalogue
Keynes: 2025now - jobs Creating Gen
.
how poorest women in world build
A01 BRAC health system,
A02 BRAC education system,
A03 BRAC banking system
K01 Twin Health System - Haiti& Boston
Past events EconomistDiary.com
include 15th annual spring collaboration cafe new york - 2022 was withsister city hong kong designers of metaverse for beeings.app
© 2025 Created by chris macrae.
Powered by
