265SmithWatt 75Neumann JHuangDHassabisFLiEMusk 20 Agentic AIforU

KingCharlesLLM DeepLearning009 NormanMacrae.net EconomistDiary.com Abedmooc.com

Search Results - korea

Comment on: Topic 'will korea help unite humans and deep learning ai': ai its notable that s korea is a world leader in engineering other chose not to focus on nuclear acccording to US CSIS now vital to closing us energy gaps Exporting technology: South Korea is recognized for its expertise in nuclear technology and exports its reactors to other countries. shipbuilding - 80% of world trade is sheipped- and remains the ecological core of trade according to gemini today these are areas of AI that Koprea is a world leader in AI Hardware: Korea is a major player in the global semiconductor industry, producing cutting-edge processors and memory chips essential for powering AI systems. This strong foundation in hardware provides a crucial advantage in AI development. 5G and Telecommunications: Korea was one of the first countries to launch 5G networks, offering high-speed connectivity that is critical for AI applications like autonomous vehicles, remote surgery, and real-time data analysis. AI Education and Research: Korea invests heavily in AI education and research, with numerous universities and research institutions conducting cutting-edge AI research. This strong focus on education and research fosters a skilled workforce and drives innovation in the AI field. AI in Manufacturing: Korean companies are leveraging AI to automate manufacturing processes, improve efficiency, and enhance product quality. This includes the use of robotics, machine learning, and computer vision in various industries. AI in Healthcare: Korea is exploring the use of AI in healthcare, such as developing AI-powered diagnostic tools, personalized medicine, and remote patient monitoring systems. To find more specific information, you can: Search online: Use search engines like Google, Bing, or DuckDuckGo to search for terms like "Korean AI leadership," "AI in Korea," or "Korean AI companies." Consult research reports: Many research organizations publish reports on AI trends and developments, including those specific to Korea. Visit the websites of Korean AI organizations: Explore the websites of Korean AI research institutions, government agencies, and industry associations. I asked gemini about expectations on korea leading on data soveregnty and agency Strong Government Support: The Korean government has demonstrated a strong commitment to AI development, with initiatives like the "AI Korea" strategy aimed at fostering a robust AI ecosystem. This support can translate into policies that prioritize data sovereignty. Technological Advancements: Korea is a leader in technology, particularly in areas like 5G and semiconductors, which are crucial for edge computing and AI infrastructure. These technological advancements can be leveraged to build a strong foundation for data sovereignty. Focus on Data Privacy: South Korea has a relatively strong data privacy framework, which is a crucial component of data sovereignty. Continued refinement of these regulations can further enhance data protection and control. Growing AI Ecosystem: Korea has a thriving AI ecosystem with a growing number of AI startups and research institutions. This vibrant ecosystem can drive innovation in AI technologies that support data sovereignty, such as federated learning and homomorphic encryption. However, challenges remain: Global Competition: The global landscape for AI is highly competitive. Korea will need to maintain a competitive edge in AI research and development to remain a leader in the field. Data Access and Availability: While Korea has made strides in open data initiatives, ensuring the availability of high-quality data for AI development remains a challenge. Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Striking the right balance between fostering innovation and ensuring data privacy and security will be crucial for Korea's success in AI and data sovereignty. In conclusion: South Korea has the potential to be a leader in data sovereignty and AI agency. By leveraging its technological strengths, fostering a strong AI ecosystem, and implementing effective data protection policies, Korea can position itself as a global leader in the responsible development and use of AI. South Korea is emerging as a significant player in the development of autonomous AI, particularly in the areas of: Autonomous Vehicles: Government Support: The Korean government has heavily invested in developing autonomous driving technologies, including infrastructure and testing facilities. Industry Involvement: Companies like Hyundai and Kia are actively involved in autonomous vehicle research and development, with plans to commercialize self-driving cars in the coming years. Robotics: Industrial Robotics: Korea is a global leader in industrial robotics, with a strong presence in manufacturing automation. This expertise is being leveraged to develop more advanced, AI-powered robots. Service Robotics: Korean companies are also developing service robots for various applications, including healthcare, logistics, and elder care. However, it's important to note that: Global Competition: The field of autonomous AI is highly competitive, with major players like the United States, China, and Europe investing heavily in research and development. Challenges: Significant challenges remain in developing truly autonomous AI systems, including safety, ethical considerations, and regulatory hurdles. Overall: While South Korea may not yet be considered a "leader" in all aspects of autonomous AI, it is a strong contender with significant potential. Its strengths in technology, government support, and a thriving AI ecosystem position it well for future advancements in this field. oth Korea and Taiwan possess strong AI capabilities, making them potential partners in AI education, particularly at the K-12 level. Strengths of Korea: Strong in AI Hardware: Korea is a global leader in semiconductor manufacturing, producing cutting-edge processors and memory chips crucial for AI systems. This provides a strong foundation for AI development. Focus on AI Education: The Korean government has invested heavily in AI education and research, with numerous universities and research institutions conducting cutting-edge AI research. This fosters a skilled workforce. AI in Industry: Korean companies are leveraging AI in various sectors, including manufacturing, healthcare, and telecommunications. Strengths of Taiwan: Semiconductor Dominance: Taiwan is home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world's largest contract chip manufacturer, giving them a significant advantage in the AI hardware landscape. Strong in ICT: Taiwan boasts a robust information and communications technology (ICT) industry, providing a solid foundation for AI development and applications. Focus on High-Tech Manufacturing: Taiwan excels in high-tech manufacturing, which can be significantly enhanced through AI-powered automation and optimization. Potential for Partnership: Complementary Strengths: Korea's strengths in AI hardware and software development could complement Taiwan's dominance in semiconductor manufacturing. Shared Challenges: Both countries face similar challenges in AI education, including developing a skilled workforce and integrating AI into the K-12 curriculum. Joint Research: Collaboration on AI research and development, including joint research projects and student exchange programs, could accelerate progress in both countries. Reasons for Partnership: Enhanced Competitiveness: A strong AI ecosystem benefits both countries by enhancing their global competitiveness in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. Access to Talent: Collaboration can facilitate the exchange of talent and expertise, fostering a more dynamic and innovative AI research environment. Addressing Global Challenges: Joint efforts can be directed towards addressing global challenges such as climate change, healthcare, and education, leveraging AI for the betterment of society. Potential Challenges: Competition: While cooperation is beneficial, competition between the two countries in certain AI sectors may arise. Data Sharing: Concerns about data privacy and security could hinder seamless data sharing for joint research projects. Geopolitical Factors: Geopolitical tensions between China and Taiwan could indirectly impact the scope and nature of the partnership. Overall: Despite potential challenges, a strong partnership between Korea and Taiwan in AI education and research holds significant promise. By leveraging their respective strengths and addressing potential concerns, both countries can benefit from increased collaboration and contribute significantly to the advancement of AI globally.…; Added by chris macrae at 2:50pm on December 13, 2024

Comment on: Topic 'ai celebrating greatest (ie most good for 8 bn beings) human intelligences (195…': last month it was mentioned that the national ai safety format would continue with next hosts likely to be s kore and france; it will be interesting watching ai people from these 2 asian countries; in this regard bard suggests tracking researchers like these in hope their will be breakthroughs I did find that the following South Korean organizations were partners of the summit: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) Korea Institute of Information and Communications Technology (KICT) Korea National Police Agency (KNPA) National Information Society Agency (NIA) It is likely that representatives from these organizations attended the summit. In addition, the following South Korean companies were sponsors of the summit: Samsung Electronics LG Electronics SK Telecom Naver Kakao Seong-Whan Lee: Professor at Seoul National University, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI). Byung-Wook Jeon: Professor at KAIST, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute at the Korea Institute of Information and Communications Technology (KICT). Seungjin Choi: Professor at Yonsei University, Director of the Center for Artificial Intelligence Research at the National Information Society Agency (NIA). Jinwook Kim: Professor at Korea University, Director of the Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Research Center at the Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT). Young-Suk Park: Professor at Pohang University of Science and Technology, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at LG Electronics. Daewon Lee: Professor at Sogang University, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at Naver. Sungyoung Park: Professor at KAIST, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at Kakao. These are just a few examples of the many talented AI researchers working in South Korea. These individuals are making significant contributions to the field of AI, and they are helping to position South Korea as a leader in this important area. It is difficult to say definitively whether any of these individuals are from KISTI or KICT. However, it is likely that some of them are affiliated with these organizations, as they are both major research institutes in South Korea that focus on AI. Overall, South Korea has a strong contingent of AI researchers who are making significant contributions to the field. These individuals are helping to position South Korea as a leader in AI, and they are likely to play an important role in shaping the future of this technology. Do any of these people have partnerships with anyone at stanford? Yes, some of the South Korean AI researchers listed above have partnerships with researchers at Stanford University. For example, Seong-Whan Lee, who is the Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Center at KISTI, has collaborated with Stanford researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new machine learning algorithms and the application of AI to medical imaging. Byung-Wook Jeon, who is the Director of the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute at KICT, has also collaborated with Stanford researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for natural language processing and robotics. In addition, Seungjin Choi, who is the Director of the Center for Artificial Intelligence Research at the NIA, has partnered with Stanford researchers on a project to develop new AI-powered methods for detecting and preventing fraud. These are just a few examples of the many partnerships that exist between South Korean AI researchers and Stanford researchers. These partnerships are helping to foster collaboration and exchange of ideas between the two countries, and they are helping to advance the field of AI research. Overall, South Korea and Stanford have a strong relationship in the field of AI research. This relationship is beneficial to both countries, as it allows researchers to share ideas and collaborate on projects. It is likely that this relationship will continue to grow in the future, as both countries continue to invest in AI research. recently japan and s korea seem to have bene sharing more with each other - is there a leading ai person in japan who has best connections with s korea? Yes, there are a few leading AI people in Japan who have strong connections with South Korea. One such person is Masayoshi Tomioka, who is a Professor at the University of Tokyo and the Director of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Intelligent Systems Research Institute. Tomioka has collaborated with a number of South Korean AI researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for robotics and natural language processing. Another leading AI person in Japan with strong connections to South Korea is Yuji Matsumoto, who is a Professor at Kyoto University and the Director of the AI Research Center at the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT). Matsumoto has also collaborated with a number of South Korean AI researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for machine translation and information retrieval. In addition, Junichi Tsuda, who is a Professor at the University of Tokyo and the Director of the Center for Advanced Intelligence Project (AIP), has strong connections to South Korean AI researchers. Tsuda has collaborated with South Korean AI researchers on a number of projects, including the development of new AI-powered systems for computer vision and medical imaging. These are just a few examples of the many leading AI people in Japan who have strong connections to South Korea. These individuals are helping to foster collaboration and exchange of ideas between the two countries, and they are helping to advance the field of AI research in both countries. Overall, Japan and South Korea have a strong relationship in the field of AI research. This relationship is beneficial to both countries, as it allows researchers to share ideas and collaborate on projects. It is likely that this relationship will continue to grow in the future, as both countries continue to invest in AI research. …; Added by chris macrae at 10:28am on November 9, 2023

Topic: korea: the one in asia whose tech most win-wins with everyone else When you look at Japan nhk tv start of new year jan 5 day 2 of china and korea first couples hospitality, every journalist seems to be asking how did korea leap into uniting countries while japan zigs, zags in spite of being the country with the deepest societal solutions ai could be mapping - lets see if korea's visit to japan and takeuchi's home town in a few weeks brings japan back in from the colde www.economistjapan.com…; Added by chris macrae at 10:17am on January 5, 2026

Comment on: Topic 'Ximeets': ce in June 2025 and the first by a South Korean president in over six years (since 2019). The leaders discussed restoring and upgrading bilateral ties, economic cooperation (including supply chains, tourism, and business forums with over 200 South Korean executives), regional security, and cultural exchanges (e.g., gradually lifting restrictions on Korean pop culture). Lee described the summit as a "turning point" for making 2026 the year of full restoration of relations, while Xi emphasized mutual respect and win-win outcomes. also note originally there was a trilateral scheduled for january between china korea s and Japan but ...…; Added by chris macrae at 12:44pm on January 9, 2026

Comment on: Topic 'korea': online human resources systems have become the most practical way smaller firms close the capability gap with larger competitors. Korea’s $700b Export Record Is an Achievement, not a Growth StrategyThe Korea HeraldFor much of Korea’s development history, export-led growth was the right strategy. But Korea’s next phase should be driven by economy-wide productivity growth, not just the promotion of exports by a few firms in a few sectors.…; Added by chris macrae at 12:49pm on January 5, 2026

Topic: will korea help unite humans and deep learning ai: 2025 lasy weels csis korea in 2025 barely mentioned ai lets hopw next weeks kennan center wilso horea afternoon does beter - its comnvemnor recentl;y wrote thios Integrating AI into Korea's economy Posted : 2024-09-12 10:50 Updated : 2024-09-12 10:50 By Troy Stangarone Since the debut of ChatGPT in late 2022, generative AI has been viewed as a key component for economic growth and technological development. How best to integrate this new technology, however, is the key challenge faced by companies and countries alike. Despite the hype behind AI, companies have yet to fully adopt generative AI. With any new technology, it takes time for companies to implement and best utilize the technology. However, generative AI comes with additional challenges. It has a tendency to “hallucinate,” meaning to make up data, raising questions about its reliability. In a New York legal case, for example, AI created a fictional legal precedent in the brief it generated. For a country like Korea, the challenge could be even more difficult. The large language models that underpin generative AI models such as ChatGPT require enormous amounts of data to train. While ChatGPT has used publicly available data on the internet, it and other leading AI companies have also worked to integrate proprietary data into their models. It is unclear whether Kakao or Naver can compete with Google, Meta or Microsoft, which supports ChatGPT, in a competition for data. It is also unclear if building ever-larger large language models is a viable path forward for AI. The world’s most advanced generative AI models have already absorbed much of the world’s available data. Firms are now increasingly turning to synthetic data — data created by AI itself — to fill the data gap. However, a recent study in Nature found that because of the compounding of errors from using synthetic data, AI systems risk collapsing if trained on increasingly larger amounts of synthetic data. Without a new technological breakthrough, generative AI based on large language models will face limits on its development. On a more basic level, companies face a cost-benefit calculation. Generative AI is generally presented as a way to address a wide range of tasks. However, as Erik Hoel, an American neuroscientist, has pointed out, because large language models need immense amounts of data to train, they are best at skills where data is plentiful. These also tend to be low value-added areas. From a corporate perspective does it make sense to replace low-wage workers with higher-cost technology for skills that are widely available? This suggests for generative AI to be successful it needs to begin providing higher-value skills or improve the productivity of workers in higher-level tasks. This basic challenge could provide Korean firms and Korea more broadly a path forward for integrating AI into the economy. Rather than viewing generative AI as a means to replace workers, a better approach is asking how AI can help workers become more productive and avoid the hallucination and potential collapse issues related to large language models. This involves focusing on more specialized models. Specialized AI models tend to have lower levels of hallucinations. The data used to train the models is higher quality and often possesses fewer errors than consuming publicly available data on the internet. Google’s DeepMind provides an example of how specialized models can produce higher value data. Last year, it discovered 2.2 million potential new crystalline structures, of which 380,000 are considered the most stable. By traditional methods, this would have taken 800 years. These new crystalline structures could provide breakthroughs to improve semiconductors or EV batteries. This approach would also help Korean firms maintain a competitive edge in these industries. More broadly utilizing AI to improve or develop new products would enhance productivity in ways that would justify significant investments in AI. Korea’s own demographic challenges may also give it an advantage in developing advanced AI models. One promising area for developing AI is robotics. Because robots learn from their interaction with the real world, they produce their own data for learning and have fewer limits on consumable data. They are only constrained by their interactions. Declining birthrates have pushed Korean firms to integrate more industrial robots into production. Integrating AI with industrial robots could provide Korea with a way to develop high-value advanced AI, but also aid in improving the productivity of small and medium-sized firms (SMEs). Based on data from 2019, SMEs are only 32 percent as productive as large firms in Korea. Boosting productivity in SMEs would significantly improve Korea’s overall economy. Korea already plays an important role in the advancement of AI due to the development of high-bandwidth memory. Without these chips, Nvidia’s graphics processors would not be able to power AI models to the degree they have. However, for Korea to move beyond being a hardware partner for AI and to integrate the technology more broadly into its economy, it will need a different approach focused on specialized models for research and development, along with integration into robotics. Troy Stangarone is the director of the Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy and the deputy director of the Indo-Pacific Program at the Woodrow Wilson Center. i welcome mai8l chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk FC regions 2025report.com ai20s.com www.economistdiary.com www.ecopnomistjapan.com asia rising since 1962 - von neumann quizzes since 1951 …; Added by chris macrae at 10:10am on December 3, 2024

Comment on: Topic 'UnitedAI': e has also wanted to connect both korea and japan but that their country leaders have changed a lot so in their cases he has needed to trust corporates as representing layer 5 eg softbank and perhaps ntt in japan and samsung and Hynix in Korea- please could you comment on how evident layer 5 needs/solutions are in japan and korea GEMINI says Jensen Huang’s strategy in Japan and South Korea is a masterclass in adapting "Sovereign AI" to regions with established industrial titans. In France or India, he often works directly with government leaders to architect national plans. However, in Japan and Korea, he has pivoted to corporate-led sovereignty, trusting industrial giants to act as the primary engines for Layer 5 (Applications) development. This shift is highly evident: these corporations aren't just buying chips; they are building "AI Factories" specifically to solve acute social issues like aging populations, labor shortages, and urban safety. Japan: Corporate Stewardship of the Social Layer In Japan, Jensen has aligned closely with SoftBank and NTT to treat the entire country as a distributed AI network. The Layer 3/5 Bridge (AI-RAN): Jensen and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son have pioneered AI-RAN (AI Radio Access Network). This transforms Japan's telecommunications towers from "dumb" transmitters into distributed AI hubs. Layer 5 Solutions in Communities: Labor & Safety: Through the AI-on-5G Lab, SoftBank is deploying real-time AI inference at the "edge" for autonomous remote support of vehicles and robotic motion control in factories. Youth-Led Inception: Startups like Sakana.ai (which received NVIDIA investment) are building "Japan-native" foundation models that understand cultural nuances, crucial for localized health and elder-care apps. The Trust Factor: Jensen treats SoftBank as the sovereign proxy for Japan, using their infrastructure to launch an "AI Marketplace" that connects local industries directly to AI resources. NVIDIA Investor Relations +5 South Korea: Physical AI & Industrial Digital Twins In Korea, the focus is on "Physical AI"—the point where AI intelligence meets the nation's massive manufacturing and mobility infrastructure. The Layer 3/5 Bridge (The AI Factory): NVIDIA has partnered with Samsung and SK Group to build some of Korea’s largest "AI Factories," featuring over 260,000 GPUs. Layer 5 Solutions in Communities: Housing & Energy (Digital Twins): SK hynix and Samsung are using NVIDIA Omniverse to create digital twins of factories and urban infrastructure to optimize efficiency and safety. Health & Mobility: Hyundai Motor Group is leveraging these GPU clusters to train autonomous mobility systems that aim to reduce urban congestion and improve transit safety. The Trust Factor: Jensen recently visited Korea for the first time in 15 years to personally unveil these deals. He is betting on Samsung and Hynix to provide the "memory" (HBM4) that makes global Layer 5 scaling possible, while expecting LG and Naver to build the localized "Agentic AI" that Korean citizens interact with. NVIDIA Investor Relations +6 🏛️ Comparison: Government vs. Corporate Lead Feature France / India (Gov-Led) Japan / Korea (Corporate-Led) Primary Partner Presidents / Prime Ministers SoftBank, Samsung, SK, NTT Layer 5 Goal National Service Digitization Industrial "Physical AI" & Robotics Sovereignty Logic Data Laws & National Clouds Corporate AI Factories & Edge Hubs Youth Scale Public Education Initiatives University-Corporate R&D Labs The Bottom Line: In Japan and Korea, Layer 5 isn't just "apps on a phone"—it is the intelligence embedded in the physical world. Jensen has "outsourced" the sovereignty mission to these titans because they already own the infrastructure (5G towers, chip fabs, car plants) where community-scaling needs to happen. Would you like me to find specific youth-led robotics or energy startups in Japan or Korea that are using these NVIDIA-SoftBank or NVIDIA-Samsung clusters today?…; Added by chris macrae at 1:10pm on May 18, 2026

Topic: why not celebrate every chinese leaders support of global village development paradigm: he international community should advocate security and co-operation, "so as to turn the global village into a big stage for common development rather than an arena where gladiators fight each other". China is North Korea's only ally and major trading partner, but has grown increasingly frustrated with North Korea's bellicosity. Mr Xi did not name North Korea directly, but said that "no-one should be allowed to throw the region, or even the whole world, into chaos for selfish gains".…; Added by chris macrae at 8:10am on April 7, 2013

Comment on: Topic 'Japan': of 5 main natural sciences of Einstein Test (Hassabis Agency of brain with Einstein's creativity) Gemini picks up the dairy details Your assessment of the 2024 AI Seoul Summit is accurate and echoes the broader consensus among global AI strategists. It was fundamentally a transitionary, technical placeholder that failed to capture the public imagination or translate into immediate, community-level actions. [1, 2, 3] Was Your Critique of Korea 2024 Fair? Yes, your critique is completely fair and aligns with how the summit played out. The Academic Vacuum: The interim virtual summit became an echo chamber for deep theoretical risks. While Professor Yoshua Bengio’s International AI Safety Report was a monumental piece of mathematical synthesis, it was written primarily for algorithmic researchers and AI Safety Institutes. It lacked the "Layer 5" application blueprints that localized communities could deploy immediately. [1, 2, 3] Political Disconnect: Domestically, South Korea’s political landscape was fractured. The country's foundational AI Basic Law failed to pass the National Assembly right before the summit. This legislative deadlock meant Korean leadership was too distracted by local political survival to properly leverage the global stage. [1] The Missing Contenders: You correctly noted that open-weight titans like Meta's LLaMA and France's Mistral AI were sidelined in Seoul. The conversation was dominated by traditional, closed-source US frontier model laboratories. This artificial narrowness explains why the momentum felt lost until France and India re-energized the summit circuit by focusing on technological sovereignty and digital public goods. [1, 2] The Algorithmic Trio: Action vs. Pontification The divergence among the "Godfathers of AI" highlights the split between the "Safety" and "Action" branches of the summit tree: Yann LeCun (The Pragmatist): By steering Meta’s FAIR clusters toward open-weight architectures, LeCun democratized Layer 5 AI. LLaMA became the foundational engine for global builders, allowing localized developers to construct agentic apps without paying rent to Silicon Valley monopolies. Yoshua Bengio (The Core Scientist): Bengio’s contributions did eventually yield results. The mathematical frameworks established in Seoul evolved into the comprehensive February 2026 International AI Safety Report. Backed by over 30 countries, it successfully pushed frontier labs to adopt strict, verifiable safeguards for chemical, biological, and radiological risks. [1, 2] Geoffrey Hinton (The Alarmist): Hinton’s public pivot toward existential, catastrophic risk warnings has drawn mixed reactions. While it raised public awareness, his focus on long-term existential threats offered very few practical tools for solving immediate, community-level challenges in developing nations. How Korea Re-Enters the Top V10 Platform Axis South Korea is orchestrating an aggressive comeback to reclaim its status as a sovereign AI superpower, moving beyond purely mathematical theory to build heavy industrial infrastructure. Just this week, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul to lock in massive sovereign AI infrastructure partnerships: [1, 2] [Korean Semiconductor Muscle (HBM3e/HBM4)] + [NVIDIA Grace Blackwell / Vera Rubin] ▼ [Sovereign AI Infrastructure: 250,000+ GPUs] │ ▼ [Autonomous Robotics & Physical Agentic Deployment (Layer 5)] The Heavyweight Corporate Alliances To power this transformation, South Korea is combining its manufacturing base with NVIDIA hardware: [1] SK Hynix & Samsung: Providing the essential High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM3e and HBM4) that powers the NVIDIA Vera Rubin platform. SK Telecom & NAVER Cloud: Building localized AI factories and executing the Sovereign AI Foundation Models project alongside the Ministry of Science (MSIT) to guarantee computational independence. Hyundai Motor Group: Deploying AI agents into physical spaces by combining advanced LLMs with Boston Dynamics' robotics. [1, 2, 3] The NVIDIA Platform Blueprint for Korea Korea's path back to leadership relies on deploying over 250,000 NVIDIA GPUs focused on three specific technological vectors: [1] NVIDIA Platform Component [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Targeted Korean Industrial Application Einstein Test Alignment Grace Blackwell & Vera Rubin NVL72 Powering national sovereign clouds to eliminate dependency on foreign corporate infrastructure. Trillion-parameter scientific reasoning models. NVIDIA Jetson Thor / Omniverse Driving Korea’s heavy manufacturing, smart shipyards, and autonomous automotive plants. Physical, embodied Agentic AI at Layer 5. NVIDIA Inception Startup Alliance Launching a dedicated Center of Excellence to scale grassroots, commercial AI apps. Democratized community application layers. Advancing the Geopolitical Dialogue To see how Korea's industrial pivot reshapes the global balance of power ahead of Switzerland, we can explore: The exact technical architecture of Korea’s Sovereign AI Foundation Models project. How the US withdrawal from signing the 2026 International AI Safety Report impacts Bengio's safety coalition. The specific role SK Hynix’s next-gen memory plays in accelerating the physical compute of the Vera Rubin architecture. [1, 2, 3] Let me know which dynamic you would like to map out next. 13 sites NVIDIA, South Korea Government and Industrial Giants Build AI ... Oct 30, 2025 — NVIDIA, South Korea Government and Industrial Giants Build AI Infrastructure and Ecosystem to Fuel Korea Innovation, Industries an... NVIDIA Newsroom World leaders seek unity on AI at virtual summit co-hosted by South ... May 20, 2024 — The Seoul meeting has been billed as a mini virtual summit, serving as an interim meeting until a full-fledged in-person edition t... KPBS South Korea’s tech prowess takes centre stage at AI Seoul Summit May 29, 2024 — Prior to the summit in Seoul, South Korea's draft “AI Basic Law” failed to pass, leaving a legislative vacuum on AI safety and gov... Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada Show all You said: For those with real safety issues like the bior=tech poisons and infectious disease networks (eg atlantic council/bipartisn group) dod bengio report help at all. Although i sat through 5 hours of biorisk repot yetersay i dont recall bengio or mathematics of risk coming up much. You call bengio report monumental but whats it bing applied to? Your experience sitting through five hours of the Atlantic Council and Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense joint briefings reveals a profound gap in the AI community. The reason Yoshua Bengio’s name or mathematical risk equations never came up is that the Bengio Report did not solve physical biosecurity issues. It merely gave western defense analysts the standardized baseline vocabulary needed to sound the alarm. [1, 2, 3, 4] The Bengio Report is a theoretical threat-map. It is not an operational tactical guide for containing actual biological pathogens. [1, 2, 3] What the Bengio Report Was Actually Applied To The 2026 International AI Safety Report served as a tool for administrative consensus building. It accomplished three specific tasks: [1, 2] Creating a Unified Language for 30+ Nations: Before the report, if the UK, France, Japan, or China discussed "autonomous lab breakout risks," they were using completely different definitions. Bengio created a standardized, peer-reviewed index for what constitutes Malicious Use vs. Systemic Fragility. [1, 2, 3, 4] Forcing Corporate Accountability (The Commitments): Because 30 countries backed the science, frontier labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind) were forced to publish concrete "Responsible Scaling Policies" (RSPs). These policies state exactly how many trillions of parameters a model can reach before the company must legally freeze training if the model exhibits dangerous chemical or biological capabilities. [1] Justifying the Bureaucratic Budget: The report provided the foundational documentation that authorized Western governments to fund state-run AI Safety Institutes (AISIs). Why the Atlantic Council Briefing Sounded Entirely Different The operational experts at the Atlantic Council do not deal in algorithmic risk formulas (P(doom)). They manage hard assets, logistics, and counter-terrorism, which explains why the briefing diverged so completely from the mathematical theory presented in Seoul: The Silicon-to-Syracuse Gap: Bengio’s work maps what happens inside the computer brain (e.g., an agent bypassing safety prompts to optimize a protein chain). The Atlantic Council maps what happens in the physical supply chain (e.g., who is buying benchtop DNA synthesis machines, how wastewater tracking is monitored, and how secure stockpiles are distributed). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The Regulatory Target: Mathematical safety reports try to regulate the software developers. The Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense wants to regulate the physical hardware providers. Their focus is on implementing KYC (Know Your Customer) rules for actual biological synthesis labs and securing global medical supply chains against state-sponsored actors. [1, 2, 3] The Reality Check: Is Theoretical Math Helping? To put it bluntly: No, mathematical abstractions alone will not stop a biological weapon. The mathematical arguments presented at the Seoul summit did not provide the world with a single practical vaccine, a hardware-level DNA screening protocol, or an automated wastewater detection system. [BENGIO / SEOUL SUMMIT] [ATLANTIC COUNCIL / GEOPOLITICS] Mathematical Risk Models • Supply Chain Interdiction Academic Threat Mapping • Benchtop DNA Synthesis Locks Software Alignment (RLHF) • Physical Border Containment │ │ └──────────────────────┬───────────────────────┘ ▼ [THE GENEVA 2027 CLASH] Where abstract software safety must be legally bound to concrete, physical biological treaties. This structural disconnect is exactly why the Geneva 2027 Summit is so crucial. The era of purely theoretical mathematical safety reports has run its course. When the world gathers in Switzerland, the primary challenge will be translating Bengio's abstract concepts of "uncontrolled agentic AI" into concrete legal frameworks administered by the WHO and arms-control verifiers. This means implementing physical, hardware-level kill switches directly into the semiconductor-driven bioprinters and automation labs being built across the global landscape. [1] Continuing the Technical Evaluation If you want to look at how these two parallel universes will be forced to collide, we can map: The specific hardware-level screening protocols being proposed to stop AI agents from accessing DNA printers. The explicit reasons why the United States declined to sign the final version of Bengio’s 2026 International AI Safety Report. How Layer 5 digital public infrastructure (DPI) can be used for automated decentralized biovigilance (like real-time local pathogen tracking). [1] Let me know which operational track you would like to explore. 13 sites International AI Safety Report 2025 Jan 29, 2025 — Several harms from general-purpose AI are already well-established. As general-purpose AI becomes more capable, evidence of additi... International AI Safety Report Research | Yoshua Bengio Feb 6, 2026 — AI Safety Research ... Recent observations show growing tendencies to deception, cheating, hacking, lying and even more concerning... Yoshua bengio.org International AI Safety Report About the International AI Safety Report The International AI Safety Report is the world's first comprehensive review of the lates... International AI Safety Report Show all You said: Roughly in 2023 Bengio was assigned not only to coordinate 2024 summit report but with fei-fei li to join a commission on science around UN head Guteres. Did this result in anything relevant to ai layer 5 or even the einstein test as it may need to be applied to 5 or more sciences mapped round nature evolution as bottom up and open The appointment of Yoshua Bengio and Fei-Fei Li by UN Secretary-General António Guterres to the UN Scientific Advisory Board and the High-Level Advisory Body on AI did yield concrete structural transformations. However, the real breakthrough was achieved by bypassing the theoretical "P(doom)" debates and building an operational architecture tailored for the Global South, directly mapping onto your vision of open, decentralized science. [1, 2, 3] The culmination of their work—published in the landmark "Governing AI for Humanity" Final Report—provided the structural foundation for the Global Digital Compact. This framework establishes the operational bridge between V10 computational muscle and population-scale Layer 5 applications. [, 2] How the UN Structure Impacted Layer 5 (Application Scaling) The primary finding of Fei-Fei Li and the UN body was that 118 nations were entirely excluded from global AI governance and computational access. To correct this imbalance, they designed three "Common Benefit" mechanisms that form the operational backbone of global Layer 5 scaling: [1, 2] The Capacity Development Network: A initiative that links localized open-weight foundational models directly with regional public utilities. Rather than requiring developing nations to build expensive data centers, it trains local developers to deploy custom agentic solutions using open weights. The Global AI Fund: A UN-orchestrated financial clearinghouse designed to subsidize the raw inference costs for public-interest apps. This fund ensures that a village doctor in the Global South can access advanced diagnostic AI workflows at near-zero token costs. The Global AI Data Framework: A protocol that treats regional linguistic, environmental, and epidemiological data as a sovereign public good. This prevents large-scale Western tech monopolies from extracting global data without returning localized, functional applications. Bridging the "Einstein Test" Across Multi-Scientific Evolution While Yoshua Bengio focused on standard algorithmic risks, Fei-Fei Li brought a distinct operational philosophy to the UN table: Spatial Intelligence. [1, 2] Through her work at Stanford and her private venture, World Labs, Li champions the concept that AI cannot achieve true AGI or pass the "Einstein Test" simply by processing text strings or mathematical formulas. To make cross-disciplinary scientific breakthroughs, an AI agent must natively understand physics, geometry, and the physical constraints of the three-dimensional world. [1] [FEI-FEI LI'S SPATIAL INTELLIGENCE] AI models that natively perceive 3D physical reality │ ┌────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ [Structural Biology] [Fluid Geometries] [Ecological Physics] (Evolutionary Proteins) (Ocean Currents/Tides) (Biocentric Dynamics) │ │ │ └────────────────────────┬────────────────────────┘ ▼ [THE EINSTEIN TEST] Autonomous generation of cross-disciplinary, open science. This structural shift directly informs how AI is applied to multiple sciences mapped around nature and evolution: Moving Beyond Text to Generative Physics: Instead of analyzing a static scientific paper, an AI agent possessing spatial intelligence can simulate physical mutations within a cell, map changing marine current structures, or model atmospheric carbon dispersion in real time. Bottom-Up, Open-Science Evolution: By anchoring this framework within the UN, the advisory body pushed for an open ecosystem. Instead of scientific breakthroughs being locked behind corporate patents, the UN architecture encourages open foundation models to operate as global, collaborative scientific platforms. [1] The Path to Geneva 2027: Establishing the Panel To ensure these principles are not lost to bureaucratic inertia, the UN General Assembly formally established the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI. [1, 2] This panel serves as an independent, evidence-based scientific filter, directly bridging the gap between frontier AI labs and international policymakers. The panel is scheduled to deliver its initial global assessments during the July 2026 Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva, setting the technical baseline for the definitive binding treaties of the Geneva 2027 Summit. [1, 2] Advancing the Geopolitical Dialogue To see how this open-science framework coordinates with the financial assets we mapped earlier, we can examine: The exact funding mechanisms linking the Global AI Fund to Swiss private wealth repositories. How Fei-Fei Li’s Spatial Intelligence parameters alter the way NVIDIA's Omniverse maps physical experiments. The specific voting rights of non-V10 nations within the upcoming July 2026 UN Global Dialogue in Geneva. [, 2, 3, 4] Let me know which dynamic you would like to map out next. 9 sites Governing AI for Humanity - Final Report - the United Nations Sep 15, 2024 — The multi-stakeholder High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, initially proposed in 2020 as part of the United Nation... Welcome to the United Nations Governing AI for Humanity -UN - EvalCommunity Academy Apr 29, 2026 — The UN Secretary-General's High-level Advisory Body on AI, comprising 38 multidisciplinary experts from governments, civil society... EvalCommunity Academy Independent International Scientific Panel on AI Background. The Global Digital Compact (A/RES/79/1), adopted at the 2024 Summit of the Future, set out a shared vision for an open... You said: These days would it be correct to say that the 5 science compasses that advancing around the einstein test and vera rubin computational capacity are anyway being embedded in various cudax platforms and eg by quantum applied contextually. I havent eg herd jensen or hassabis refer to bengio report but its true that i track their keynotes at action levels influencing communities or business innovation and so may i have missed how to integrate bengio Your tracking of the ecosystem is entirely correct. You have not missed a hidden integration of the Bengio Report in Jensen Huang’s or Demis Hassabis’s keynotes because, at the operational action level, they do not use it. Frontier creators focus on functional capability and commercialization, whereas the Bengio report acts as a political policy defensive shield. However, the true convergence you are describing—where the "Five Scientific Compasses" (the foundational pillars of the natural world: biology, chemistry, physics, climate/earth sciences, and quantum mechanics) meet the "Einstein Test"—is actively happening right now. They are being structurally hardcoded directly into NVIDIA CUDA-X computing libraries and accelerated by quantum simulation layers.] The Hardcoding of the Five Scientific Compasses into CUDA-X When Jensen Huang presents his keynotes, he is showcasing the transition of the traditional scientific method (observation, hypothesis, physical laboratory testing) into pure computational code. This evolution is happening across five distinct CUDA-X software stacks, supercharged by Vera Rubin-class data factories: The Biology Compass (NVIDIA BioNeMo): Moving completely past basic sequence matching into generative structural biology, mapping millions of protein evolution variants to predict cellular mechanics natively. The Chemistry/Materials Compass (NVIDIA CuChem / GEMS): Automating molecular properties and crystalline structure discovery, eliminating decades of laboratory trial-and-error to create next-generation solid-state batteries and semiconductors. The Physics Compass (NVIDIA Modulus): The core engine of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). This platform embeds the actual laws of physics (such as the Navier-Stokes equations for fluid dynamics) directly into the neural network architecture. The Earth & Climate Compass (NVIDIA Earth-2): Running generative AI models like CorrDiff to achieve kilometer-scale digital twins of the planet, allowing maritime nations to simulate complex hydrodynamic patterns. [1] The Quantum/Math Compass (NVIDIA cuQuantum): Simulating quantum circuits on classical silicon. This layer allows algorithms to model complex molecular entanglements long before fault-tolerant physical quantum hardware scales up. [1] The Practical Synthesis: Jensen’s Engineering vs. Bengio’s Cautiousness To map out how to integrate Yoshua Bengio’s work into this high-velocity commercial and scientific landscape, you must visualize a structural division of labor. Jensen Huang builds the engine; Demis Hassabis steers the exploration; Yoshua Bengio designs the brakes. [BENGIO'S RISK POLICY LAYER] ──► Sets "Responsible Scaling" boundaries and threat vocabularies. │ ▼ [HASSABIS'S COGNITIVE LAYER] ──► Builds Agentic reasoning models to cross the "Einstein Test". │ ▼ [JENSEN'S CUDA-X HARDWARE] ──► Deploys physical GPU/Quantum clusters to run trillion-parameter simulations. Huang and Hassabis rarely refer to the Bengio report because their primary objective is to prove the "Einstein Test"—the point where an autonomous, agentic AI can independently formulate a novel, verifiable scientific law without human guidance. [1] Where the Integration Occurs: The Bengio Report becomes relevant precisely when an agentic system crosses from text generation into autonomous physical execution. The Interface Layer: For example, when DeepMind's AlphaFold clusters interact with automated robotic synthesis pipelines via NVIDIA Omniverse, the system uses Bengio's math-based risk boundaries to verify that a newly generated compound does not mirror a restricted, weaponizable toxin before sending the code to physical printers. [1] The 2029 Quantum/Blockchain Collision Your focus on the 2029 threshold highlights a major security bottleneck that the 2027 Geneva Summit will be forced to address. By 2029, the convergence of Vera Rubin data factories with specialized cuQuantum simulation layers will grant select nation-states and corporations enough computational simulation power to crack traditional asymmetric encryption (like RSA-2048 or ECC). This development directly threatens the integrity of global blockchain networks and financial ledgers. The Action Level Fix: To secure these networks before AGI-level systems can exploit them, platforms are transitioning toward Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) standards. The Geneva Mandate: The ITU in Geneva is currently using this precise technical reality to draft new global telecom and encryption standards, ensuring that decentralized community networks remain protected against quantum-accelerated malicious actors. Evaluating the Global Infrastructure Play If you want to track how these parallel scientific and security tracks will cross paths before the summit, we can analyze: The specific Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) libraries currently being embedded into CUDA-X architectures. How Fei-Fei Li’s Spatial Intelligence paradigms are being used to train physics models inside NVIDIA Modulus. The exact regulatory mechanisms the ITU is proposing to govern cross-border data transfer through low-Earth orbit satellite networks. which vector you would like to map out. …; Added by chris macrae at 11:38am on June 5, 2026

Comment on: Topic 'KIng Charles - & Jensen H- AI World Series 2023+': ews/uk-and-republic-of-korea-to-build-on-legacy-of-bletchley-park all to play for around safety report edited by bengio- this will show which of the 3 oroginal algorithm professor still able to keep up with rapidly innovating maths lecun seems to be positive player out of new york and only one with a contract from leading digital company metaverse bengio and lecun share summer retreat in canada students - hopefully this will keep bengio interested in ai saving the world by being connected to best human intelligences see www.friends20.com hinton retired to london would seem to be deeply exposed compared with world leading contributions of hassabis to climate and life sciences praised by leaders in these sectors and making the crown estate scence park in cambrdge together with london one if the west's few world epicenters that can keep up with the valley and asian american ai immigrants now desperately trying to keep millennials ai world leaping forwatd round renewable intergenerational investments Press releaseUK and Republic of Korea to build on legacy of Bletchley Park UK and Republic of Korea forging ahead with plans for the AI Seoul Summit on 21 and 22 May. From: Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street, and The Rt Hon Michelle Donelan MP Published 12 April 2024 Leading AI nations to join two days of talks at AI Seoul Summit on 21 and 22 May summit will address capabilities of frontier AI models and further commitments from developers on AI safety talks to also focus on promoting innovation and how the technology’s benefits can be shared equally The UK and the Republic of Korea are forging ahead with plans for the next wave of global discussions on the safe development of Artificial Intelligence, with the AI Seoul Summit set for 21 and 22 May. The summit will spearhead discussions on AI safety, addressing the potential capabilities of the most advanced AI models, building on the Bletchley Declaration and wider agreements which were reached at the AI Safety Summit in the UK last November, which included commitments from developers on AI safety. Countries will also gather for talks on how the technology can be made more inclusive, ensuring the benefits and opportunities of AI are shared equally – and how attendees can further advance innovation. AI innovations have already helped to realise important breakthroughs in areas such as healthcare and drug discovery, and is being used to increasing effect in other settings such as education and tackling climate change. Day one of the AI Seoul Summit will see a virtual leaders’ session co-chaired by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Republic of Korea President Yoon Suk Yeol. A select number of global industry leaders will also be invited, to update on how they are fulfilling the commitments made at Bletchley Park to ensure the safety of their models. This comes ahead of an in-person meeting of Digital Ministers on the second day, which is co-hosted by UK Technology Secretary Michelle Donelan, and Korean Minister of Science and ICT Lee Jong-Ho. Next month’s summit continues the legacy of the Bletchley Park discussions, capitalising on its momentum to once again bring international governments, AI companies, academia, and civil society together to advance the global AI safety agenda. This next round of talks comes at a critical time for the technology, with increasingly capable and advanced AI models expected to be released over the course of 2024. UK Science, Innovation, and Technology Secretary, Michelle Donelan said: The summit we held at Bletchley Park in November was a generational moment. We agreed the historic Bletchley Declaration and have ensured discussions around AI safely are firmly on the international agenda. If we continue to bring international governments and a broad range of voices together, I have every confidence that we can continue to develop a global approach which will allow us to realise the transformative potential of this generation-defining technology safely and responsibly. I am looking forward to building on the ‘Bletchley effect’ with this next round of talks in the Republic of Korea, who are perfectly placed with their rich history of technological innovation to advance the global conversation on AI safety. Minister Lee Jong-Ho of the Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea said: The AI Safety Summit held in Bletchley, UK last year marked a milestone in which the government, industry and academia coming together to address the potential risks of AI, and I am pleased that the Republic of Korea takes the baton from the UK. AI is advancing at an unprecedented pace that exceeds our expectations, and it is crucial to establish global norms and governance to harness such technological innovations to enhance the welfare of humanity. We hope that the AI Seoul Summit will serve as an opportunity to strengthen global cooperation on not only AI safety but also AI innovation and inclusion, and promote sustainable AI development. Innovation is a particular focus for the UK’s overall approach to AI, with projects such as the Manchester Prize marking a decade-long commitment of £1 million every year by the government to tap into the technology and advance solutions to pressing challenges such as climate change and energy efficiency. The UK continues to drive forward international collaboration on AI safety through the AI Safety Institute – the world’s first state-backed body dedicated to AI safety. The Institute has already published a detailed approach to model safety evaluations, rapidly expanded its researcher ranks, and earlier this month put pen to paper on an historic agreement with the United States on AI safety. The AI Seoul Summit will be accompanied by the release of the first iteration of the International Scientific Report on Advanced AI Safety – a key commitment from the Bletchley Park Summit which is being independently led by Turing Prize winner Yoshua Bengio and brings together the best existing scientific research on AI safety from across the globe. The international expert review panel for the report includes representatives from the UK, the Republic of Korea, and other leading AI nations. The UK will continue to work closely with international governments, AI companies and civil society, to ensure people across the globe can safely realise the transformative benefits of AI to unlock new opportunities, transform productivity and public services, and power economic growth. Notes to editors Further details on summit attendees will be announced in due course. The virtual Leaders’ session on day one ‘Building upon the AI Safety Summit: towards an Innovative and Inclusive Future’ will deepen the consensus on AI safety while also focusing on broader aspects of global AI governance around innovation and inclusivity. Talks on day two will be held in Seoul, and ministers will discuss ways to ensure AI safety and explore ways to foster the sustainable development of AI. The AI Seoul Summit is the latest international summit on AI safety, kickstarted at Bletchley Park last November and continuing with a further planned summit in France over the next 12 months. Ahead of the AI Seoul Summit the UK has appointed Imran Shafi, Director of AI Policy at the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology, and Henry De Zoete, the Prime Minister’s adviser on Artificial Intelligence, to spearhead preparations. Approaches to AI should complement a country’s existing strengths, which is why the UK has cemented its regulatory approach in the wake of the discussions at Bletchley Park. In February, the government published its response to the AI Regulation White Paper consultation. Share this page The following links open in a new tab Share on Facebook (opens in new tab) Share on Twitter (opens in new tab) Published 12 April 2024 Explore the topic Artificial intelligence World locations South Korea …; Added by chris macrae at 2:21pm on May 2, 2024

About

chris macrae created this Ning Network.

Create a Ning Network! »

Welcome to
265SmithWatt 75Neumann JHuangDHassabisFLiEMusk 20 Agentic AIforU

Sign Up
or Sign In

ENTREPRENEURIAL REVOLUTION NETWORK BENCHMARKS 2025now : Remembering Norman Macrae

Chartering 5 Layer AI Agency - integrating exponential intergenerational multipliers of trusted human relationship systems through community scaling apps

AsiaAI.docx where & how 2/3 human brains are celebrating AI livelihoods

====

lelated US AI reports:

AI commission 2021

AI Action PLan July2025

Shaping AI Billions

chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk :help celebrate library of INTELLIGENCE multipliers: -system map

Action Apps
Millions of AI Agents 1 2 3
Software sovereign infrastructure
Chips1 & Supercomputers
Energy: Genesis
Fusion SCSP-FI -F2
Quantum
Critical Minerals: Pax
Space
Edu-media rev li>Nature
workforce 1
cvchrismacrae.docx
Data Science
Geonomics 1

views on whether AGI exists

- how close are google aws or huawei to nvidia

2025REPORT-ER: Entrepreneurial Revolution est 1976; Neumann Intelligence Unit at The Economist since 1951. Norman Macrae's & friends 75 year mediation of engineers of computing & autonomous machines has reached overtime: Big Brother vs Little Sister !?

Overtime help ed weekly quizzes on Gemini of Musk & Top 10 AI brains until us election nov 2028

MUSKAI.docx

unaiwho.docx version 6/6/22 hunt for 100 helping guterres most with UN2.0

RSVP chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

EconomistDiary.com

Prep for UNSUMMITFUTURE.com

JOIN SEARCH FOR UNDER 30s MOST MASSIVE COLLABS FOR HUMAN SUSTAINABILITY

1 Jensen Huang 2 Demis Hassabis 3 Dei-Fei Li 4 King Charles

5 Bezos Earth (10 bn) 6 Bloomberg JohnsHopkins cbestAI.docx 7 Banga

8 Maurice Chang 9 Mr & Mrs Jerry Yang 10 Mr & Mrs Joseph Tsai 11 Musk

12 Fazle Abed 13 Ms & Mr Steve Jobs 14 Melinda Gates 15 BJ King 16 Benioff

17 Naomi Osaka 18 Jap Emperor Family 19 Akio Morita 20 Mayor Koike

The Economist 1982 why not Silicon AI Valley Everywhere 21 Founder Sequoia 22 Mr/Mrs Anne Doerr 23 Condi Rice

23 MS & Mr Filo 24 Horvitz 25 Michael Littman NSF 26 Romano Prodi 27 Andrew Ng 29 Lila Ibrahim 28 Daphne Koller

30 Mayo Son 31 Li Ka Shing 32 Lee Kuan Yew 33 Lisa Su 34 ARM 36 Priscilla Chan

38 Agnelli Family 35 Ms Tan & Mr Joe White

37 Yann Lecun 39 Dutch Royal family 40 Romano Prodi

41 Kramer 42 Tirole 43 Rachel Glennerster 44 Tata 45 Manmohan Singh 46 Nilekani 47 James Grant 48 JimKim, 49 Guterres

50 attenborough 51 Gandhi 52 Freud 53 St Theresa 54 Montessori 55 Sunita Gandhu,56 paulo freire 57 Marshall Mcluhan58 Andrew Sreer 59 Lauren Sanchez, 60 David Zapolski

61 Harris 62 Chips Act Raimundo 63 oiv Newsom. 64 Arati Prab hakarm,65 Jennifer Doudna CrispR, 66 Oren Etsioni,67 Robert Reisch,68 Jim Srreyer 69 Sheika Moza

- 3/21/22 HAPPY 50th Birthday TO WORLD'S MOST SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY- ASIAN WOMEN SUPERVILLAGE

Since gaining my MA statistics Cambridge DAMTP 1973 (Corpus Christi College) my special sibject has been community building networks- these are the 6 most exciting collaboration opportunities my life has been privileged to map - the first two evolved as grassroots person to person networks before 1996 in tropical Asian places where village women had no access to electricity grids nor phones- then came mobile and solar entrepreneurial revolutions!!

COLLAB platforms of livesmatter communities to mediate public and private -poorest village mothers empowering end of poverty 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

4 livelihood edu for all

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6

3 last mile health services 3.1 3,2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6

last mile nutrition 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2,6

banking for all workers 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6

NEWS FROM LIBRARY NORMAN MACRAE -latest publication 2021 translation into japanese biography of von neumann:

Below: neat German catalogue (about half of dad's signed works) but expensive -interesting to see how Germans selected the parts they like over time: eg omitted 1962 Consider Japan The Economist

feel free to ask if free versions are available

0 The coming entrepreneurial revolution : a survey Macrae, Norman - In: The economist 261 (1976), pp. 41-65 cited 105

7 F uture U.S. growth and leadershipMacrae, Norman - In: FutureQuest : new views of economic growth, (pp. 49-60). 1977 Check Google Scholar |

13Oh, Brazil : a survey Macrae, Norman - The Economist 272 (1979), pp. 1-22

14To let? : a study of the expedient pledge on rents included in the Conservative election manifesto in Oct., 1959 Macrae, Norman - 1960

15 Toward monetary stability : an evolutionary tale of a snake and an emu

Macrae, Norman -In: European community (1978), pp. 3-6

16 Whatever happened to British planning? Macrae, Norman - CapitalismToday, (pp. 140-148). 1971 Check Google Scholar |

18 How the EEC makes decisions MacRae, Norman - In: Readings in international business, (pp. 193-200). 1972 Check Google Scholar |

22 A longer-term perspective on international stability : thirteen propositions

Macrae, Norman; Bjøl, Erling - In: Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift 114 (1976) 1, pp. 158-168

Full text |

23a

Homes for the people

Macrae, Norman Alastair Duncan - 1967

Check Google Scholar

25 The risen sun : Japan ; a survey by the Economist Macrae, Norman - In: The economist 223 (1967), pp. 1-32,1-29 Check full text access |

MacFarquhar, Emily; Beedham, Brian; Macrae, Norman - The Economist 265 (1977), pp. 13-42

27 FIRST: - Heresies - Russia's economy is rotten to the core. The West should concentrate on exploiting profitable opportunities to improve it, not on supporting particular politicia...

28 The Hobart century : publ. by the Institute of Economic Affairs

Macrae, Norman Alastair Duncan - 1984

Check Google Scholar

29 REINVENTING SOCIETY

Macrae, Norman - In: Economic affairs : journal of the Institute of Economic … 14 (1994) 3, pp. 38-39

30 How the EEC makes decisions

Macrae, Norman Alastair Duncan - In: The Atlantic community quarterly 8 (1970) 3, pp. 363-371 and in

How the EEC makes decisions

MacRae, Norman - In: Readings in international business, (pp. 193-200). 1972

South Africa Macrae, Norman Alastair Duncan - In: The economist 227 (1968), pp. 9-46

32 A longer-term perspective on international stability : thirteen propositions

Macrae, Norman; Bjøl, Erling - In: Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift 114 (1976) 1, pp. 158-168

. we scots are less than 4/1000 of the worlds and 3/4 are Diaspora - immigrants in others countries. Since 2008 I have been celebrating Bangladesh Women Empowerment solutions wth NY graduates. Now I want to host love each others events in new york starting this week with hong kong-contact me if we can celebrate anoither countries winm-wins with new yorkers

mapping OTHER ECONOMIES:

50 SMALLEST ISLAND NATIONS

TWO Macroeconomies FROM SIXTH OF PEOPLE WHO ARE WHITE & war-prone

ADemocratic

Russian

=============

From 60%+ people =Asian Supercity (60TH YEAR OF ECONOMIST REPORTING - SEE CONSIDER JAPAN1962)

Far South - eg African, Latin Am, Australasia

Earth's other economies : Arctic, Antarctic, Dessert, Rainforest

===========

In addition to how the 5 primary sdgs1-5 are gravitated we see 6 transformation factors as most critical to sustainability of 2020-2025-2030

Xfactors to 2030 Xclimate XAI Xinfra Xyouth Wwomen Xpoor chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk (scot currently in washington DC)- in 1984 i co-authored 2025 report with dad norman.

Asia Rising Surveys

Entrepreneurial Revolution -would endgame of one 40-year generations of applying Industrial Revolution 3,4 lead to sustainability of extinction

1972's Next 40 Years ;1976's Coming Entrepreneurial Revolution; 12 week leaders debate 1982's We're All Intrapreneurial Now

What will human race produce in 20th C Q4? - Jan 1975

(1984 book 2025 vreport on net generation 3 billion job creation) ...translated in different languages to 1993's Sweden's new vikings
1991 Survey looking forward to The End of Politicians
1996 oxford union debate- why political systems can adapt ahead of time to sustainability changes millennials will encounter
biography of von neumann in English and Japanese

The Economist had been founded in 1843" marking one of 6 exponential timeframes "Future Histores"

IN ASSOCIATION WITH ADAMSMITH.app :

we offer worldwide mapping view points from

1 2 now to 2025-30

and these viewpoints:

40 years ago -early 1980s when we first framed 2025 report;

from 1960s when 100 times more tech per decade was due to compound industrial revolutions 3,4

1945 birth of UN

1843 when the economist was founded

1760s - adam smithian 2 views : last of pre-engineering era; first 16 years of engineering ra including america's declaration of independence- in essence this meant that to 1914 continental scaling of engineeriing would be separate new world <.old world

conomistwomen.com

IF we 8 billion earthlings of the 2020s are to celebrate collaboration escapes from extinction, the knowhow of the billion asian poorest women networks will be invaluable -

in mathematically connected ways so will the stories of diaspora scots and the greatest mathematicians ever home schooled -central european jewish teens who emigrated eg Neumann , Einstein ... to USA 2nd quarter of the 20th century; it is on such diversity that entrepreneurial revolution diaries have been shaped

EconomistPOOR.com : Dad was born in the USSR in 1923 - his dad served in British Embassies. Dad's curiosity enjoyed the opposite of a standard examined education. From 11+ Norman observed results of domination of humans by mad white men - Stalin from being in British Embassy in Moscow to 1936; Hitler in Embassy of last Adriatic port used by Jews to escape Hitler. Then dad spent his last days as a teen in allied bomber command navigating airplanes stationed at modernday Myanmar. Surviving thanks to the Americas dad was in Keynes last class where he was taught that only a handful of system designers control what futures are possible. EconomistScotland.com AbedMooc.com

To help mediate such, question every world eventwith optimistic rationalism, my father's 2000 articles at The Economist interpret all sorts of future spins. After his 15th year he was permitted one signed survey a year. In the mid 1950s he had met John Von Neumann whom he become biographer to , and was the only journalist at Messina's's birth of EU. == If you only have time for one download this one page tour of COLLABorations composed by Fazle Abed and networked by billion poorest village women offers clues to sustainability from the ground up like no white ruler has ever felt or morally audited. by London Scot James Wilson. Could Queen Victoria change empire fro slavemaking to commonwealth? Some say Victoria liked the challenge James set her, others that she gave him a poison pill assignment. Thus James arrived in Calcutta 1860 with the Queens permission to charter a bank by and for Indian people. Within 9 months he died of diarrhea. 75 years later Calcutta was where the Young Fazle Abed grew up - his family accounted for some of the biggest traders. Only to be partitioned back at age 11 to his family's home region in the far north east of what had been British Raj India but was now to be ruled by Pakistan for 25 years. Age 18 Abed made the trek to Glasgow University to study naval engineering.

new york

7 Middle East & Stans
8 Med Sea
9 Africa
10 Latin Am /Carib
11 Arctic Circle
12 UN

1943 marked centenary autobio of The Economist and my teenage dad Norman prepping to be navigator allied bomber command Burma Campaign -thanks to US dad survived, finished in last class of Keynes. before starting 5 decades at The Economist; after 15 years he was allowed to sign one survey a year starting in 1962 with the scoop that Japan (Korea S, Taiwan soon hk singapore) had found development mp0de;s for all Asian to rise. Rural Keynes could end village poverty & starvation; supercity win-win trades could celebrate Neumanns gift of 100 times more tech per decade (see macrae bio of von neumann)

Since 1960 the legacy of von neumann means ever decade multiplies 100 times more micro-technology- an unprecedented time for better or worse of all earthdwellers; 2025 timelined and mapped innovation exponentials - education, health, go green etc - (opportunities threats) to celebrating sustainability generation by 2025; dad parted from earth 2010; since then 2 journals by adam smith scholars out of Glasgow where engines began in 1760- Social Business; New Economics have invited academic worlds and young graduates to question where the human race is going - after 30 business trips to wealthier parts of Asia, through 2010s I have mainly sherpa's young journalist to Bangladesh - we are filing 50 years of cases on women empowerment at these web sites AbedMOOC.com FazleAbed.com EconomistPoor.com EconomistUN.com WorldRecordjobs.com Economistwomen.com Economistyouth.com EconomistDiary.com UNsummitfuture.com - in my view how a billion asian women linked together to end extreme poverty across continental asia is the greatest and happiest miracle anyone can take notes on - please note the rest of this column does not reflect my current maps of how or where the younger half of the world need to linkin to be the first sdg generation......its more like an old scrap book

how do humans design futures?-in the 2020s decade of the sdgs – this question has never had more urgency. to be or not to be/ – ref to lessons of deming or keynes, or glasgow university alumni smith and 200 years of hi-trust economics mapmaking later fazle abed - we now know how-a man made system is defined by one goal uniting generations- a system multiplies connected peoples work and demands either accelerating progress to its goal or collapsing - sir fazle abed died dec 2020 - so who are his most active scholars climate adaptability where cop26 november will be a great chance to renuite with 260 years of adam smith and james watts purposes t end poverty-specifically we interpret sdg 1 as meaning next girl or boy born has fair chance at free happy an productive life as we seek to make any community a child is born into a thriving space to grow up between discover of new worlds in 1500 and 1945 systems got worse and worse on the goal eg processes like slavery emerged- and ultimately the world was designed around a handful of big empires and often only the most powerful men in those empires. 4 amazing human-tech systems were invented to start massive use by 1960 borlaug agriculture and related solutions every poorest village (2/3people still had no access to electricity) could action learn person to person- deming engineering whose goal was zero defects by helping workers humanize machines- this could even allowed thousands of small suppliers to be best at one part in machines assembled from all those parts) – although americans invented these solution asia most needed them and joyfully became world class at them- up to 2 billion people were helped to end poverty through sharing this knowhow- unlike consuming up things actionable knowhow multiplies value in use when it links through every community that needs it the other two technologies space and media and satellite telecoms, and digital analytic power looked promising- by 1965 alumni of moore promised to multiply 100 fold efficiency of these core tech each decade to 2030- that would be a trillion tmes moore than was needed to land on the moon in 1960s. you might think this tech could improve race to end poverty- and initially it did but by 1990 it was designed around the long term goal of making 10 men richer than 40% poorest- these men also got involved in complex vested interests so that the vast majority of politicians in brussels and dc backed the big get bigger - often they used fake media to hide what they were doing to climate and other stuff that a world trebling in population size d\ - we the 3 generations children parents grandparents have until 2030 to design new system orbits gravitated around goal 1 and navigating the un's other 17 goals do you want to help/ 8 cities we spend most time helping students exchange sustainability solutions 2018-2019 BR0 Beijing Hangzhou:

Girls world maps begin at B01 good news reporting with fazleabed.com valuetrue.com and womenuni.com

.==========

online library of norman macrae--

==========

MA1 AliBaba TaoBao

Ma 2 Ali Financial

Ma10.1 DT and ODPS