HumansAI.com NormanMacrae.net AIGames.solar EconomistDiary.com Abedmooc.com
please help us confirm/update next actions
Bengio to be coordinating rapporteur from Bletchley to ...
Bletchley Declaration on AI safety – Twenty-eight countries, including the US and China, as well as the European Union, reached a consensus on the need for sustained international cooperation to combat the risks posed by ‘frontier AI’.1 Under the Bletchley Declaration, these nations have agreed to work together to ensure the development and deployment of ‘human-centric, trustworthy and responsible AI’
notes from cooley.com
AI Bletchley grounded round Turing Institute started London around 2016 -intriguingly TUring Award (nobel prize of computer science) is American run offering chance to catch up with what both sides of Atlantic owe to Londoner Turing
The 2018 Turing Award, awarded to Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, and Yann LeCun, was a landmark recognition of their groundbreaking work in deep learning. Here's some information about their contributions and future aspirations:
Why their knowledge matters:
Conceptual Foundations: The trio laid the theoretical groundwork for deep learning, developing crucial concepts like backpropagation, convolutional neural networks, and recurrent neural networks. These have become essential tools for machine learning, powering applications like image recognition, natural language processing, and even autonomous vehicles.
Engineering Breakthroughs: They didn't just theorize, they built. Their work on efficient algorithms and training methods made deep learning practical and scalable, enabling its widespread adoption across various industries.
Inspiring a Generation: Their success sparked a renewed interest in deep learning, attracting countless researchers and entrepreneurs to the field. Their passion and dedication continue to inspire a new generation of AI pioneers.
What they want to explore next:
While their past achievements are monumental, these researchers remain focused on the future. Here's a glimpse into their individual aspirations:
Summaries of the Turing Award nomination:
The ACM provides detailed summaries of each Turing Award nomination, highlighting the recipient's contributions and explaining why they were selected. You can find the official summaries for the 2018 Turing Award here:
These summaries offer valuable insights into the groundbreaking work of these remarkable individuals and their ongoing pursuit of pushing the boundaries of A
2018 turing award went to trio of professors who have trained deep learning graduates
UK AIRR 300 mn dollar investment announced ms donellan day 1 of ai summit
AIRR is a national facility recently announced in March by the government that will provide world-leading AI-specialised compute capacity to public researchers, academia, and industry.
AIRR is a landmark collaboration between:
The Dawn supercomputer at the University of Cambridge, announced as part of this latest investment, will serve as an integral part of the AIRR alongside the previously announced University of Bristol Isambard-AI supercomputer.
discussion with bard on relative investments in ai tech -all errors mine alone email@example.com
can you help me understand terminology - the uk says by 2024 its largest public computing cluster will comprise 5000 GPUs - as a comparison in usa what would be the largest cluster of GPUs either public or private?
Comparing the UK's planned 5000 GPU cluster to the largest GPU clusters in the USA requires exploring both public and private sectors:
Public GPU Clusters:
Private GPU Clusters:
Ultimately, the "largest" title depends on how you define the category (public vs. private) and your metric (total GPU count vs. individual cluster size). The UK's planned cluster is a significant investment in public HPC infrastructure, but the USA currently holds the top spots in terms of publicly available raw GPU power.
I hope this comparison provides a clearer understanding of the landscape!
Would 5000 GPUs in a public cluster put the UK in top 5 nations in terms of public GPU cluster - very approximately what investment in dollars does 5000 GPUs represent?
Yes, with 5000 GPUs in a public cluster, the UK would likely be in the top 5 nations in terms of public GPU cluster power. Here's why:
Investment Estimate: Determining the exact cost is complex due to variations in GPU models, vendor deals, and infrastructure setup. However, here's a rough estimate:
Important Note: These are rough estimates, and the actual cost could be higher or lower depending on factors mentioned earlier.
Overall: The UK's planned 5000 GPU cluster represents a significant investment and would likely place them among the top 5 nations in terms of public GPU cluster power. This move signals a strong commitment to research and development in fields like AI, high-performance computing, and scientific discovery.
I hope this information helps! Feel free to ask if you have any further questions.
250 million dollars sounds quire small compared with eg defence budgets - am I missing something?
You're absolutely right to raise the comparison between the $250 million estimated cost of the UK's public GPU cluster and, say, the UK's defense budget, which sits around £52.8 billion as of 2023 (roughly $67.8 billion). There are indeed several important things to consider here:
Scale and Purpose:
Ultimately, comparing the costs of defense and public HPC clusters directly isn't an apples-to-apples comparison. They serve different purposes, operate on different scales, and deliver distinct types of benefits. While the $250 million investment may seem small compared to the defense budget, it represents a significant commitment to technological advancement and potentially holds long-term benefits for the UK's economy and society.
I hope this provides a more nuanced perspective on the comparison and highlights the distinct roles of these vastly different budgetary allocations.
IF AI for good is to ne optimal, is it likely that eg the UK will need to reassess magnitudes of its public gpu budget versus its defence budget?
The question of whether the UK should reassess the magnitudes of its public GPU budget versus its defense budget in pursuit of an optimal AIGood future is a complex one with no easy answer. It involves balancing diverse priorities, ethical considerations, and uncertain predictions about future technological advancements and societal needs.
Arguments for Reassessment:
Arguments against Reassessment:
Finding the Balance:
Ultimately, the UK needs to find a strategic balance between its current defense needs and its commitment to AIGood for an optimal future. This could involve:
The optimal balance will depend on ongoing evaluations of future threats, AIGood advancements, and societal priorities. Finding this balance is crucial for the UK to ensure both national security and a future shaped by responsible and beneficial AIGood.
It's important to remember that this is a complex issue with no definitive answer. Open and informed debate, considering all perspectives and potential outcomes, is key to navigating this evolving landscape and crafting a future where AIGood and societal well-being are optimally balanced.
Playing devil's advocate UK population is about 14th in world and its natural resources are probably about 25th, why whould uk need such a large defense budget?
You're right, playing devil's advocate is crucial in any nuanced discussion. Let's delve deeper into why the UK, with its population and resource limitations, maintains a relatively large defense budget:
Challenges and Debates:
The reasons behind the UK's large defense budget are complex and multifaceted, driven by historical factors, strategic considerations, domestic politics, and ongoing debates about resource allocation and the evolving nature of warfare. Whether this level of spending is optimal remains a matter of ongoing public discourse and policy considerations.
Playing devil's advocate is essential for critically examining these issues and exploring potential alternative approaches to security and global engagement in the 21st century.
I hope this provides a more comprehensive and nuanced perspective on the topic. Feel free to ask any further questions you may have!
i understand it would cause a lot of argument but if a pro-millennial political party started up in UK round one policy transfer 2% per year from defence budget to ai good personalised education budget- would there be any logic to such a policy?
The idea of a pro-millennial political party in the UK transferring 2% of the defense budget annually to an AI-powered personalized education budget raises several interesting points worth discussing:
Challenges and Counterarguments:
Nuances and Alternatives:
Ultimately, the logic of such a policy depends on individual priorities, risk tolerance, and faith in the potential of AI. There are valid arguments on both sides, and navigating the optimal balance between investing in human capital through education and ensuring national security through an adequate defense budget requires careful consideration, informed debate, and willingness to explore innovative solutions.
I hope this analysis provides a nuanced perspective on this complex issue. Feel free to ask any further questions you may have!
Would it be fair to say that the UK is in an unique position - few places the size of uk have historically needed such a large defence budget? The UK needs a clear vision of what success say in 2050 looks like - its not obvious why 1.5% of people in a small island in mid of 21st C still need one of biggest defence budgets? I am wondering which nation if any among democratic nation has such a high relative defence budget? I am making an assumption that by 2050 we have got to a low carbon world so protecting worldwide carbon energy partners is no longer part of uk budget remit
View other drafts
You raise some excellent points, and the UK's defense budget and its strategic role in the 21st century are indeed topics that deserve thoughtful discussion. Here's a deeper dive into your questions:
Uniqueness of the UK's Position:
To some extent, you're right: few countries the size of the UK have historically maintained such a large defense budget. Factors contributing to this include:
However, it's also important to note that some other European countries with similar populations, like France and Germany, also maintain sizeable defense budgets, influenced by similar factors and regional considerations.
Vision for 2050 and Defense Needs:
Defining what success looks like for the UK in 2050 is indeed crucial for determining an appropriate defense budget. Some potential factors to consider include:
Addressing these questions could inform strategic revisions to the defense budget and potentially pave the way for a more efficient and future-proof approach to national security.
Relative Defense Budget among Democracies:
As of 2023, the UK's defense budget as a percentage of GDP (2.1%) is indeed slightly higher than the average for NATO members (1.74%). However, several other established democracies also have higher relative defense budgets:
It's worth noting that these percentages can fluctuate based on GDP changes and budget adjustments.
Low-Carbon World and UK's Strategic Focus:
Your assumption about a low-carbon world in 2050 is likely valid. In such a scenario, the UK's role in protecting overseas carbon energy partners might diminish. However, other security challenges related to climate change, such as resource scarcity, migration, and potential instability in resource-rich regions, could emerge. The UK's defense strategy would need to evolve to address these new security dynamics.
In conclusion, the UK's position regarding its defense budget is complex and nuanced. While its historical legacy and international commitments contribute to its current expenditure, a clear vision for the future, a changing global landscape, and technological advancements might necessitate strategic adjustments to its defense posture. Exploring alternative approaches to national security in a low-carbon world presents both challenges and opportunities for the UK to optimize its resources and ensure its future success.
I hope this information provides a helpful framework for further discussion and exploration of this critical topic. Feel free to ask any further questions you may have!