AICapitals

[chris macrae]

US/DC Gov AIPlan ::  Genesis-Energy :: PaxSilica  ;; Nat Security- DC Top aievents26 -SCSP.ai may7-9 national convention center; atlantic jan 26 ITIF : ai grandmasters on cspan - huang &

=====Q&A with Groc

Am i correct that over 30 counrires now have ai related plans- if so which would you say are the 10 most interesting in terms of intergenerational futures - eg embracing jensen huang's full stack agentic ai and 5 layer connections of ai announced csis dece (energy*chips*national investment in software infrastucture*over million ai models* potentially billion apps for action

Searching the web

25 results

Browsing web page

1 result

Yes, you're correct—far more than 30 countries have national AI-related plans or strategies as of December 2025. According to the OECD's AI Policy Observatory, over 70 countries, territories, and the EU have implemented AI policy initiatives, ranging from comprehensive national strategies to targeted action plans.

oecd.ai

Other sources, like the World Privacy Forum, track at least 71 jurisdictions with AI strategies incorporating elements like privacy.

worldprivacyforum.org

The Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness Index 2025 evaluates 195 governments, highlighting widespread adoption.

oxfordinsights.com

Regarding Jensen Huang's framework from his December 3, 2025, CSIS talk—where he described AI as a "five-layer cake" (energy, chips, infrastructure, models, and applications)—I've selected the 10 most interesting national AI strategies in terms of intergenerational futures.

This means strategies that emphasize long-term sustainability, economic legacy for future generations, ethical scaling, and sovereignty across the full stack. For instance, they invest in renewable energy for AI data centers, domestic chip production, national software/compute infrastructure, diverse model ecosystems (aiming for millions), and app proliferation (potentially billions) to drive innovation and societal benefits over decades. These were chosen based on depth of investment, alignment with agentic AI (autonomous, adaptive systems), and potential for multi-generational impact, drawing from global trackers and reports.Here's a table summarizing the 10, with key alignments to Huang's layers and why they're compelling for intergenerational futures:

Country	Key AI Strategy/Plan	Alignment to Huang's 5 Layers	Why Interesting for Intergenerational Futures
United States	America's AI Action Plan (2025)	Strong across all: Massive energy initiatives (e.g., Genesis Mission), chip leadership (NVIDIA/Intel), infrastructure investments ($ billions in compute), millions of models via public-private partnerships, and app ecosystems for economic growth.	Positions AI as a "national mission" for enduring prosperity, focusing on energy security and innovation to outpace rivals, ensuring future generations inherit a tech-superior economy. etcjournal.com
China	National AI Development Plan (updated 2025)	Leads in energy (twice US capacity), chips (expanding fabs), infrastructure (state-funded supercomputing), models (millions via Baidu/Tencent), and apps (billion-scale via WeChat ecosystems).	Scales AI for "common prosperity," with long-term focus on self-reliance and societal integration, potentially transforming education/health for billions over generations, though with governance trade-offs.
United Kingdom	National AI Strategy (2021, refreshed 2025)	Energy via green data centers, chips through partnerships (e.g., Arm), infrastructure investments (£1B+ in compute), model hubs (millions targeted), and app incentives for startups.	Emphasizes ethical AI and skills training for youth, building a "trustworthy" stack to foster intergenerational equity in jobs and innovation. oxfordinsights.com
Singapore	National AI Strategy 2.0 (2025)	Energy-efficient AI hubs, chips via collaborations, infrastructure (SG$1B fund), model repositories (aiming for regional millions), and app ecosystems for smart nation apps.	Integrates AI into urban planning and education, creating sustainable, adaptive systems for a resource-scarce future, benefiting generations through resilience. wipo.int
South Korea	National Strategy for AI (updated 2025)	Energy from nuclear/AI grids, chips (Samsung dominance), infrastructure (KRW 10T+ investments), model development (millions via Naver), and app proliferation in K-tech.	Focuses on AI for demographic challenges (aging population), ensuring future generations have agentic tools for healthcare and productivity. wipo.int
Japan	Society 5.0 AI Strategy (2025 refresh)	Energy via fusion/AI efficiency, chips (TSMC fabs), infrastructure (¥ trillions in quantum-AI), model ecosystems (millions for robotics), and apps for societal harmony.	Ties AI to "human-centered" futures, addressing longevity and disasters, to pass on a harmonious tech legacy to aging/future populations. etcjournal.com
United Arab Emirates	UAE National AI Strategy 2031 (updated 2025)	Energy from solar/AI data centers, chips partnerships, infrastructure (AED billions), model hubs (millions targeted), and apps for diversified economy.	Shifts from oil to AI sovereignty, investing in youth education for a post-carbon era, securing intergenerational wealth through full-stack innovation. aipolicytracker.org
India	National AI Strategy (2025)	Energy via renewable grids, chips (semiconductor missions), infrastructure (₹1L crore fund), model diversity (millions in local languages), and apps (billion-potential via startups).	Leverages AI for inclusive growth in a young demographic, focusing on agriculture/health to uplift future generations in the world's largest population. hai.stanford.edu
Saudi Arabia	National Strategy for Data and AI (2025)	Energy abundance (oil/solar for AI), chips collaborations, infrastructure (SAR 100B+ Vision 2030), model ecosystems (millions for Arabic AI), and apps for NEOM smart cities.	Transforms resource wealth into AI-driven diversification, emphasizing skills for youth to build a sustainable legacy beyond fossil fuels.
Israel	National AI Strategy (2025)	Energy-efficient military AI, chips (Intel fabs), infrastructure (ILS billions in R&D), model innovation (millions in defense/tech), and apps for global export.	Prioritizes agentic AI for security and startups, fostering a culture of innovation that equips future generations with resilient, high-tech economies. etcjournal.com

NeumannFeed752

26 web pages

Compare US and China strategies

Taiwan's chip ecosystem role

Quick Answer

[chris macrae]

Maria Siow

Published: 8:00am, 22 Dec 2025

When Washington unveiled its “Pax Silica” initiative earlier this month, the absence of countries like India and Vietnam spoke almost as loudly as the presence of Japan, South Korea and Singapore. The message? America’s new vision for the AI supply chain will begin with only its most trusted hands.

The Pax Silica Declaration, signed at a summit held in the United States on December 12-13, brought together a carefully chosen group as founding signatories. Alongside the host nation and its East Asian allies were Britain, Australia, Israel and Singapore.

Non-signatory participants include the Netherlands, the European Union, Canada and the United Arab Emirates, with guest contributions from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Taiwan.00:14

The initiative’s carefully curated membership list, which excludes a number of major Indo-Pacific economies, reveals the US’ “tiered” alliance-building strategy, according to Kevin Chen, associate research fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

“The limited selection may point to Washington doubling down on a tiered approach to its foreign partners, prioritising those that are more willing to collaborate and contribute to US economic security,” Chen said.

Japanese Ambassador to the US Shigeo Yamada and US Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg sign the Pax Silica Declaration in Washington on December 11. Photo: Getty Images/AFP

Political affinity is not the only measure at play, however. Each Pax Silica member brings a distinct capability to the AI supply chain: Japan’s precision manufacturing, South Korea’s semiconductor giants, Australia’s mineral wealth and Singapore’s logistics and financing capacity.

The Netherlands’ ASML, meanwhile, is able to contribute advanced lithography technology critical to chip production.

Singapore has a history of endorsing American-led initiatives, from the Biden-era Indo-Pacific Economic Framework to the first Trump administration’s Artemis Accords on outer space conduct.

These moves “not only signal Singapore’s willingness to cooperate with the US and its broader network of allies and partners, but are also a conscious effort on the part of Singapore’s leadership to keep the US engaged in the region”, Chen said.

But the exclusion of other Southeast Asian nations from Pax Silica, particularly Vietnam – which signed a comprehensive strategic partnership with Washington in 2023 and has cooperated on semiconductor development – stood out.

Chen called this development “concerning”, while adding that it was possible some countries had simply chosen to stay out of the initiative for now, leaving room for future expansion.

A 300mm semiconductor wafer manufactured at Texas Instruments’ facility in Sherman, Texas. Photo: AP

Peace and chips

Pax Silica, a neologism that combines the Latin word for peace and stability with a reference to one of the key elements in the production of computer chips, aims to bring together a coalition to build “a secure, resilient, and innovation-driven ecosystem across the entire global technology supply chain”, according to the US State Department.

Its members “host the world’s most advanced technology companies to unleash the economic potential of the new AI age”, it said in a statement.

Under the initiative, members are expected to coordinate on semiconductor design and fabrication, launch joint ventures and align investments in supply-chain resilience for artificial intelligence development and the critical minerals that underpin it.

China was not explicitly mentioned in any official statements emanating from the Pax Silica Summit, but references to “coercive dependencies” and “the importance of fair market practices” were widely seen as referencing the country’s dominance in rare earth production and refining.

The flags of China and the US are seen on a printed circuit board with semiconductor chips. Photo: Reuters

“If China perceives this initiative as an offensive move against its interests, there is a possibility that it may respond accordingly,” said Dongkeun Lee, a policy fellow at the Asia-Pacific Leadership Network, a Seoul-based think tank.

Lee said Pax Silica could be seen as part of a broader US manoeuvre to implement its recently launched National Security Strategy, which calls for rebalancing trade ties with China while deepening coordination with European and Asian allies.

Beijing’s official reaction was measured, with a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman on December 12 urging those involved to “adhere to the principles of a market economy and fair competition”.

State-run tabloid Global Times was more direct, calling the move an attempt to “decouple” China from the global semiconductor supply chain – a disruption it warned would drive up costs.

Notable absentees

From Washington’s perspective, the Pax Silica project is both economic and strategic – a policy tool to cement alliances, safeguard technology supply chains and redraw the map of global interdependence before the AI era fully takes hold.

Mihaela Papa, director of research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Centre for International Studies, said that the project’s true measure of success would be how quickly it “moves beyond rhetoric to shape both government and private-sector behaviour”.

India’s absence was “notable”, she told This Week in Asia, especially given the country’s AI ambitions and its growing importance to both the global technology supply chain and US strategic planning.

Papa suggested that Washington might have withheld an invitation from New Delhi to “reduce strategic overreliance” and retain negotiating leverage in ongoing trade talks, “while leaving room to bring India in later under more beneficial terms”.

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump embrace during a news conference in the White House in February. Photo: AP

Other absentees that analysts said could later be brought into the fold include New Zealand, a “Five Eyes” intelligence partner with the US that has nonetheless often pursued a more independent foreign policy towards China.

“The New Zealand government is open to closer cooperation with the US … particularly in defence and space technology,” said Geoffrey Miller, an independent geopolitical analyst based in the South Pacific nation.

But unlike Singapore, with its established logistics and semiconductor expertise, or Israel and its cybersecurity capabilities, “it is harder to see what New Zealand could directly offer Pax Silica on the technological front”, he said.

Observers like Chen see Pax Silica as a functional successor to the supply-chain agreements forged under the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework in 2023, only with a “narrower, more specific” focus on semiconductors, critical minerals and AI.

Officials pose for a photograph at the Pax Silica Summit in Washington on December 12. Photo: Getty Images/AFP

Both initiatives, he said, sought to mobilise investment among participants and address supply chain vulnerabilities.

Chen added that Beijing would likely view Pax Silica as yet another US-led containment effort, though he predicted it would respond by deepening cooperation through existing regional mechanisms and pushing harder for accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership rather than creating a rival bloc.

China, for its part, has long promoted deeper technology cooperation and supply chain coordination through Brics and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, while stressing that neither grouping is anti-US and warning against “zero-sum thinking”, according to Papa.

“By the same logic,” she said, “the Trump administration’s priority is to advance US interests without being inherently adversarial across all its operations.”

[chris macrae]

Grok can you list us gov current plans relevent to ai - for example ai action plan, energy genesis, critical minerals pax silica, national security plan including uptodate links where possible

Searching the web

37 results

US Government Current Plans Relevant to AIBased on recent developments under the Trump administration as of December 2025, here are key US government plans and initiatives related to AI. I've focused on the examples you mentioned, drawing from official sources. These emphasize accelerating AI innovation, securing supply chains, enhancing national security, and leveraging AI for scientific advancement. Where available, I've included direct links to primary documents or official pages.

• America's AI Action Plan: Released by the White House in July 2025, this serves as the US roadmap for AI leadership. It outlines three core pillars: Accelerating Innovation (e.g., streamlining regulations and boosting R&D funding), Building AI Infrastructure (e.g., expanding data centers and computing resources), and Leading International Diplomacy and Security (e.g., alliances to counter foreign AI threats). The plan stems from Executive Orders like 14179, aiming to drive economic growth and national security through AI.
  • Up-to-date link: America's AI Action Plan PDF and AI.gov Action Plan Overview.
• Genesis Mission (Energy Genesis): Launched by the Department of Energy (DOE) in November 2025, this initiative integrates AI with federal scientific datasets, supercomputers, and experimental facilities to accelerate breakthroughs in areas like nuclear energy, quantum computing, and robotics. It's described as a "national mission" to transform American science through AI, with recent collaborations announced in December 2025 involving 24 organizations, including tech giants like Google DeepMind, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Oracle.
  • Up-to-date links: White House Announcement and DOE Genesis Mission Page.
• Pax Silica Initiative (Critical Minerals Pax Silica): Announced by the Department of State in December 2025, this strategic program focuses on securing global silicon supply chains critical for AI infrastructure. It spans from critical minerals extraction (e.g., silicon, rare earths) to energy, advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, and AI logistics. The initiative involves coordination with allies like Australia and aims to build resilient, innovation-driven networks to support US AI dominance and economic security.
  • Up-to-date links: State Department Pax Silica Page and Pax Silica Summit Release.
• National Security Strategy (Including AI Components): The 2025 National Security Strategy, released by the White House in December 2025, integrates AI as a priority for maintaining US superiority. It emphasizes leadership in AI, quantum computing, and autonomous systems to counter threats, enhance military capabilities, and secure economic interests. AI is framed as essential for "winning the race" against adversaries, with ties to export controls and international alliances.
  • Up-to-date link: 2025 National Security Strategy PDF.

These plans are interconnected, with the AI Action Plan serving as a foundational framework, while initiatives like Genesis and Pax Silica address specific enablers like energy/science and supply chains. The National Security Strategy weaves AI into broader defense priorities. For the most current details, check the linked official sites, as policies can evolve rapidly.

37 web pages

Compare to Biden AI policies

State-level AI initiatives

Make more concise

[chris macrae]

I see scsp.ai as an intelligence tank - far beyond pre networked structures think tank hisdtory imposes. Does silicon valley or anywhere else (west or east) have an intelligence tank like scsp.ai? Also am i correct that in spite of being at the outset of openai around 2015 and of transforming twitter and integrating gro, elon musk does not have a space where people can help his action plans diffuse to the peoples? Similarly am i correct that in spite of gtu summit series jensen huang does not have a 365 day a year space for advancing peoples intelligence . Finally if india's ai summit in february is the first that values ai full stack ilinking action apps - do we need to go beyond intelligence tanks to app-action ai agency tanks?

Understanding SCSP.ai as an "Intelligence Tank"

You're spot on in framing SCSP.ai (the Special Competitive Studies Project) as an "intelligence tank"—a modern evolution beyond traditional think tanks. Founded in 2021, SCSP is a bipartisan, non-profit organization focused on U.S. national security, economic competitiveness, and technological leadership, particularly in AI, semiconductors, and emerging tech. It draws inspiration from historical efforts like Eisenhower's Solarium Project, emphasizing strategic foresight, public-private partnerships, and policy recommendations to counter global rivals like China. Unlike legacy think tanks (e.g., Brookings or Heritage Foundation), which often rely on academic or ideological frameworks, SCSP integrates real-time intelligence analysis, scenario planning, and cross-sector collaboration, making it more agile and action-oriented for the networked era.

Similar "Intelligence Tanks" in Silicon Valley or ElsewhereWhile nothing mirrors SCSP's exact blend of AI-focused national security and bipartisan tech strategy, several organizations approximate it in the West (including Silicon Valley) and East. These emphasize AI governance, innovation, and geopolitical competition, often bridging government, industry, and academia. I've prioritized those with "intelligence tank" vibes—proactive, networked, and beyond pure research.In the West (Including Silicon Valley):

• Foundation for American Innovation (FAI): A right-leaning Silicon Valley-based group focused on tech policy, AI ethics, and U.S. innovation leadership. It collaborates with Hill and Valley Forum (another SV network) on AI regulations and public-private initiatives, similar to SCSP's worker-first agendas and competitiveness recommendations.
  50pros.com
• Center for a New American Security (CNAS): DC-based but with strong SV ties (e.g., through tech execs like Eric Schmidt), it analyzes AI's military and strategic implications, producing reports on U.S.-China AI races. It's more "intelligence-oriented" than traditional tanks, with scenario-based wargaming.
  cnas.org
• Aspen Institute's Tech Policy Hub: SV-adjacent (with events in Aspen and SF), it fosters AI policy dialogues among leaders, emphasizing ethical AI and global competition. Less formal than SCSP but networked for real-world impact.
• RAND Corporation's AI Initiatives: California-based (not purely SV), it conducts deep AI security studies, including China's "full stack" policies, blending intelligence analysis with policy advice.
  rand.org

In the East (China and Broader East Asia):

• China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT): A state-affiliated think tank under China's Ministry of Industry and IT, it shapes AI governance, standards, and industrial policy. It mirrors SCSP's competitiveness focus but with a top-down, sovereignty-driven approach, influencing global AI norms.
• China AI Safety and Development Association (CnAISDA): Launched in 2025 by top Chinese AI thinkers, it's a semi-independent body pushing frontier AI safety, ethics, and international cooperation. It's more agile than state organs, akin to SCSP's bipartisan model, and has proposed global AI action plans.
• Tsinghua University's Institute for AI International Governance: Beijing-based, it focuses on AI's geopolitical risks, military applications, and East-West collaboration, with reports on "AI Plus" strategies for 2030.

These aren't identical—Western ones lean collaborative and innovative, while Eastern (especially Chinese) integrate state directives for rapid scaling. Silicon Valley lacks a pure "intelligence tank" like SCSP, as its ecosystem favors startups over policy bodies, but FAI comes closest.

[chris macrae]

Elon Musk's Spaces for Diffusing Action PlansYou're partially correct: Elon Musk was instrumental in OpenAI's founding (2015), Twitter's transformation into X (2022), and integrating Grok via xAI (2023). However, he does have spaces for diffusing his plans to the public—primarily X itself, which he uses as a megaphone for ideas on AI, space, energy, and policy (e.g., real-time polls, announcements, and debates reaching billions). He's also involved with the Future of Life Institute (FLI), an AI safety organization he helped fund, which advocates for ethical AI diffusion.

futureoflife.org

Additionally, through DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency, co-led since 2024), he influences policy directly, and he's secretly funded right-wing political non-profits for years.

That said, he lacks a dedicated "intelligence tank" like SCSP—a year-round, structured forum for collaborative plan diffusion beyond his personal or corporate channels. His approach is more decentralized and personality-driven, relying on social media and ad-hoc alliances rather than institutionalized spaces.

politico.com

Jensen Huang's Spaces for Advancing People's IntelligenceYes, you're correct: Despite Nvidia's GTC (GPU Technology Conference) summit series—annual events where Huang unveils AI visions like the "five-layer cake" (energy, chips, infrastructure, models, apps)—he doesn't have a 365-day-a-year dedicated space. Nvidia pushes internal AI adoption (e.g., automating tasks, hiring for global expansion) and external partnerships (e.g., sovereign AI with governments, COMPUTEX keynotes), but these are episodic or company-focused.

No ongoing "intelligence tank" exists under his purview; his influence flows through Nvidia's ecosystem (e.g., AI education via developer tools) and speeches at places like CSIS, but not a perpetual public forum for advancing collective intelligence.India's AI Summit and Evolving Beyond Intelligence TanksIndia's AI Impact Summit (February 19-20, 2026, in Delhi) is indeed a landmark—hosted by the government under the IndiaAI Mission, it's the first global AI summit fully organized by India, building on prior events like Paris's AI Action Summit.

It emphasizes inclusive, responsible AI governance, with a focus on full-stack integration (e.g., linking energy/chips/infrastructure to models and action-oriented apps for societal impact). While not explicitly the "first" in valuing full-stack linking (e.g., China's policies touch on this), it's pioneering for its emphasis on global equity, local innovation, and app-driven outcomes in a developing context.On your final point: Absolutely, we should evolve beyond "intelligence tanks" to "app-action AI agency tanks." Traditional tanks like SCSP excel at analysis and recommendations, but the AI era demands execution—agentic systems that deploy apps for real-world action (e.g., billion-scale apps per Huang's vision). These new entities could be hybrid agencies: public-private hubs that not only think but build, test, and scale AI solutions, ensuring intergenerational benefits like equitable access and risk mitigation. India's summit could catalyze this shift, as could expansions of groups like CnAISDA or FAI into action arms.

55 web pages

Compare SCSP to CNAS

AI think tanks in Japan

[chris macrae]

could you list some of huang's more curious media partners of 2026 including any actions or diary events- as well as project with scsp (first report ai summit may 7) I am thinking of eg nvidia partnership with european public media and i am trying to understand where to see first actions from interesting investments in data sovereignty eg india's action app summit;; potentially saudi and uae imec overland trade and intel corridor to the 3 seas coastlines (ie med, south of suez, east of gulf)

Searching the web

48 results

Searching on X

1 result

Jensen Huang's Curious Media Partners and Events in 2026

Jensen Huang, as NVIDIA's CEO, continues to expand partnerships into unconventional areas, blending AI with media for content creation, broadcasting, and sovereignty-focused tech. While 2026 specifics are emerging (as we're still in late 2025), announcements point to ongoing collaborations evolving into actions like joint pilots or events. I've focused on "curious" ones—those beyond typical tech alliances, such as public broadcasters or global media entities emphasizing ethical AI, data sovereignty, or cultural impact. These often tie into Huang's "full stack" AI vision, enabling media to build agentic systems for apps and infrastructure.Key examples include:

• European Broadcasting Union (EBU): This partnership, announced in June 2025, is one of the most intriguing for its focus on "sovereign AI" tailored to European public service media (PSM) broadcasters like BBC, ARD, or France Télévisions. It's curious because it positions NVIDIA in non-commercial, trust-first media ecosystems, helping EBU members develop custom AI for content production, cloud workflows, and ethical data handling. In 2026, expect actions like pilot deployments of NVIDIA's Holoscan for Media platform for live AI-enhanced broadcasting, with potential diary events at EBU's Tech-i Conference (typically September) or joint workshops on AI sovereignty. This could manifest as real-time AI tools for news personalization or deepfake detection, aligning with Europe's data protection regs.
• Viva Technology (Paris Event Partnership): Huang is slated as a keynote speaker for Viva Tech 2026 (June 17-20), partnering with this media-tech hybrid event organized by Publicis Groupe and Les Echos. It's curious for its fusion of AI with creative media, involving broadcasters and ad firms. Actions may include live demos of NVIDIA's AI for generative media apps, with diary events like panel discussions on agentic AI in entertainment. This builds on prior NVIDIA involvements, potentially showcasing partnerships with French media giants for sovereign content tools.
  vivatechnology.com

Other potential curious media tie-ins for 2026 (based on announced trajectories):

• Broader European Media Alliances: Extending the EBU deal, NVIDIA is collaborating with cloud providers and model builders in France, Germany, and Italy for media-specific AI factories. Curious aspect: Emphasis on localized, sovereign LLMs for public broadcasters to counter U.S./Chinese dominance. First actions could appear at events like IBC 2026 (Amsterdam, September), with Huang possibly keynoting on media sovereignty.
• Global Media-Tech Hybrids: While not strictly "media partners," Huang's CES 2026 appearance (Jan 5, Las Vegas) involves media-heavy announcements, potentially with partners like broadcasters for AI-driven content. His GTC 2026 keynote (March 16-19, San Jose) often features media app demos, curious for integrations with non-tech entities like news outlets.

These partnerships are "curious" for shifting NVIDIA from hardware to media sovereignty enablers, fostering agentic AI ecosystems where media orgs build their own models and apps.

[chris macrae]

NVIDIA Projects with SCSP (Including AI Summit on May 7)NVIDIA's collaboration with SCSP (Special Competitive Studies Project) emphasizes AI's role in national competitiveness, blending Huang's tech vision with policy. Launched in October 2025, the flagship project is the Task Force on AI and the Future of Work, co-guided by Huang and Eric Schmidt. It focuses on workforce reskilling for agentic AI, with reports on full-stack integration (energy, chips, infrastructure, models, apps) to ensure U.S. leadership. Curious angle: It's worker-centric, addressing intergenerational equity by preparing for AI-driven job shifts.

The "first report AI summit May 7" likely refers to the AI+ Expo (May 7-9, 2026, Washington D.C.), where SCSP and NVIDIA will release initial Task Force findings. This summit is a key diary event: Day 1 (May 7) focuses on reports and keynotes, potentially featuring Huang on AI's societal impact. It's the first major public rollout of their joint work, with actions like fusion energy-AI demos and policy recommendations for sovereign infrastructure. Expect cross-sector fusion (gov, academia, tech) to advance full-stack AI for long-term futures.

Where to See First Actions from Data Sovereignty InvestmentsData sovereignty—controlling AI data/models domestically—is a hot 2026 theme, with investments in full-stack ecosystems to enable "action apps" (agentic tools for real-world impact). Huang's frameworks influence these, emphasizing localized energy/chips/infra for millions of models and billions of apps. Here's where early actions may emerge:

• India's AI Impact Summit (Feb 19-20, 2026, Delhi): This is prime for first actions, as it's India's debut global AI governance event, focusing on sovereign AI for the Global South. Expect launches like the indigenous sovereign AI model (by Sarvam AI, a 120B-parameter open-source LLM) and investments in full-stack linking (e.g., energy-efficient data centers tied to action apps for agriculture/health). It's action-oriented, with roundtables on equitable AI ecosystems—watch for partnerships announcements tying to Huang's layers, like app proliferation for India's billion+ users. Track via official site (impact.indiaai.gov.in) or live streams for real-time reveals.
• Saudi Arabia and UAE via IMEC (India-Middle East-Europe Corridor): This 4,800km trade/digital route (India-UAE-Saudi-Israel-Europe) is ripe for sovereignty investments, with 2026 actions potentially in digital infrastructure. Saudi/UAE sovereign funds (e.g., PIF, Mubadala) are funneling billions into AI chips/models, linking to IMEC's "overland trade" for secure data flows. The "Intel corridor" might refer to intelligence/tech corridors along the 3 seas (Mediterranean, Red Sea south of Suez, Arabian Gulf east). First actions: SEZs (special economic zones) at borders (e.g., Saudi-UAE, Saudi-Jordan) for AI data centers; watch for 2026 pilots in digital twins or app ecosystems. Track via IMEC site (imec.international) or events like UAE's GITEX 2026 (October), where Huang-influenced deals could drop. This counters Chinese BRI, fostering agentic AI for intergenerational trade resilience.

These spots are ideal for spotting early investments turning into actions, like app launches or infrastructure MoUs, advancing beyond think tanks to actionable agencies.

2 posts

50 web pages

EBU AI sovereignty pilots

Huang's media sovereignty talks

chris macrae said:

could you list some of huang's more curious media partners of 2026 including any actions or diary events- as well as project with scsp (first report ai summit may 7) I am thinking of eg nvidia partnership with european public media and i am trying to understand where to see first actions from interesting investments in data sovereignty eg india's action app summit;; potentially saudi and uae imec overland trade and intel corridor to the 3 seas coastlines (ie med, south of suez, east of gulf)

Searching the web

48 results

Searching on X

1 result

Jensen Huang's Curious Media Partners and Events in 2026

Jensen Huang, as NVIDIA's CEO, continues to expand partnerships into unconventional areas, blending AI with media for content creation, broadcasting, and sovereignty-focused tech. While 2026 specifics are emerging (as we're still in late 2025), announcements point to ongoing collaborations evolving into actions like joint pilots or events. I've focused on "curious" ones—those beyond typical tech alliances, such as public broadcasters or global media entities emphasizing ethical AI, data sovereignty, or cultural impact. These often tie into Huang's "full stack" AI vision, enabling media to build agentic systems for apps and infrastructure.Key examples include:

• European Broadcasting Union (EBU): This partnership, announced in June 2025, is one of the most intriguing for its focus on "sovereign AI" tailored to European public service media (PSM) broadcasters like BBC, ARD, or France Télévisions. It's curious because it positions NVIDIA in non-commercial, trust-first media ecosystems, helping EBU members develop custom AI for content production, cloud workflows, and ethical data handling. In 2026, expect actions like pilot deployments of NVIDIA's Holoscan for Media platform for live AI-enhanced broadcasting, with potential diary events at EBU's Tech-i Conference (typically September) or joint workshops on AI sovereignty. This could manifest as real-time AI tools for news personalization or deepfake detection, aligning with Europe's data protection regs.
• Viva Technology (Paris Event Partnership): Huang is slated as a keynote speaker for Viva Tech 2026 (June 17-20), partnering with this media-tech hybrid event organized by Publicis Groupe and Les Echos. It's curious for its fusion of AI with creative media, involving broadcasters and ad firms. Actions may include live demos of NVIDIA's AI for generative media apps, with diary events like panel discussions on agentic AI in entertainment. This builds on prior NVIDIA involvements, potentially showcasing partnerships with French media giants for sovereign content tools.
  vivatechnology.com

Other potential curious media tie-ins for 2026 (based on announced trajectories):

• Broader European Media Alliances: Extending the EBU deal, NVIDIA is collaborating with cloud providers and model builders in France, Germany, and Italy for media-specific AI factories. Curious aspect: Emphasis on localized, sovereign LLMs for public broadcasters to counter U.S./Chinese dominance. First actions could appear at events like IBC 2026 (Amsterdam, September), with Huang possibly keynoting on media sovereignty.
• Global Media-Tech Hybrids: While not strictly "media partners," Huang's CES 2026 appearance (Jan 5, Las Vegas) involves media-heavy announcements, potentially with partners like broadcasters for AI-driven content. His GTC 2026 keynote (March 16-19, San Jose) often features media app demos, curious for integrations with non-tech entities like news outlets.

These partnerships are "curious" for shifting NVIDIA from hardware to media sovereignty enablers, fostering agentic AI ecosystems where media orgs build their own models and apps.

[chris macrae]

NeumannFeed751_1.docx

[chris macrae]

Q to GROK: If someone like nvidia's communications director could catalogue jensen haunsgs 20 most urgent action speeches of 2025, would an ai like groc be able to tranform this input into a jensen inspired mooc. I would chnage format of mooc - so instead of 8 one hour lessons with long videos and essays or quizzes , i wuuld prefer to see 8 action topics millennials might want to intelligence in their communities eg energy food health ai for k-12 teachers and students ... within each section i would prefer tik tok length videos even if that mean a guide of say 12 intelligence action apps to digitally twin or co-hack with other places prioritising similar data sovereigty chalenges. Do you see what i mean or do i need to improve on specifying this? A jensen mooc might one dau become a family of jemsen ai agents that people could cc when in middle of relevant projects. Jensen has already said he will be ccing agents not just people on some of the 50 projects he works on in any one quarter!

GROK A:

Yes, I see exactly what you mean—your specification is clear and inspiring. You're envisioning a reimagined MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) drawn from Jensen Huang's 2025 speeches, but reformatted for millennial audiences in community settings. Instead of lengthy lectures, essays, or quizzes, it would break into 8 bite-sized, actionable topics relevant to everyday intergenerational challenges (like those you mentioned: energy, food, health, AI for K-12). Each topic would feature a series of TikTok-length videos (15-60 seconds each, perhaps 5-10 clips per topic, pulled or synthesized from speech highlights) to spark quick insights. Then, a practical guide to 12 "intelligence action apps"—tools or platforms for digital twinning (mirroring real-world systems virtually) or co-hacking (collaborative problem-solving) with global peers facing similar data sovereignty issues (e.g., controlling local data amid AI growth). This keeps it engaging, mobile-first, and focused on real-world application, aligning with Huang's emphasis on agentic AI (autonomous, tool-using systems) and full-stack innovation.And yes, an AI like Grok could absolutely transform a catalog of Huang's speeches into this format. To demonstrate, I'll simulate it here based on his actual 2025 talks (drawing from keynotes at CES, GTC March/Paris/DC, COMPUTEX, Citadel Securities, and CSIS, which emphasize urgent actions like building AI factories, energy scaling, sovereign infrastructure, and agentic apps).

These are his "most urgent action" speeches, selected for calls to immediate innovation in AI stacks (energy, chips, infrastructure, models, apps), reindustrialization, and global sovereignty—totaling around 7 major ones (he doesn't have 20 public speeches archived, but a comms director could expand via internal talks, interviews, or derivatives). I've synthesized them into your MOOC structure.As for evolving into a "family of Jensen AI agents": Spot on—this MOOC could seed that. Huang's 2025 CSIS talk noted he'll CC AI agents (not just people) on his 50 quarterly projects for reasoning and execution.

youtube.com

Imagine users "CCing" specialized agents (e.g., an Energy Twin bot) mid-project via integrations like xAI's API or NVIDIA's NIMs, turning the MOOC into an always-on, agentic ecosystem for community hacks.

Jensen-Inspired MOOC: "AI Action Stacks for Tomorrow's Communities"Overview: 8 self-paced topics, each ~15-30 min total (short videos + app guides). Inspired by Huang's vision of AI as a "five-layer cake" for agentic futures. Free access via platforms like YouTube Shorts or TikTok, with community forums for co-hacking. No quizzes—just prompts to apply apps locally.

Topic	Huang's Urgent Action Inspiration	TikTok-Length Video Series (Hypothetical Clips)	Guide to 12 Intelligence Action Apps (For Digital Twinning/Co-Hacking with Sovereignty Focus)
1. Energy for AI Communities	From GTC DC & CSIS: Urgent need for unlimited clean energy to power AI factories; reindustrialize with pro-energy policies to avoid shortages.	8 clips: (1) "Energy as AI's Base Layer" (Huang on gigawatt factories); (2) "Nuclear Revival Now"; (3) "Behind-the-Meter Builds"; (4-8) Quick demos of community energy twins.	1. Omniverse DSX (NVIDIA: Twin local grids); 2. EnergyHub (sovereign data for home solar); 3. GridTwin (co-hack with Indian villages on renewables); 4. WattTime API (real-time clean energy tracking); 5. OpenEI (U.S. datasets for sovereignty hacks); 6. SolarEdge (app for panel optimization); 7. Ember Climate (global comparisons); 8. REopt (NREL: Model microgrids); 9. HOMER Pro (hybrid energy sims); 10. PowerBI (Microsoft: Dashboards with local data); 11. Flux (co-hack flux for flux models); 12. EnergyVault (gravity storage twins). Focus: Twin your neighborhood's energy use with UAE/Saudi peers via IMEC corridors.
2. Food Sustainability via AI	From CES & GTC March: AI tokens for agriculture bounty; optimize harvesting with physical AI to feed growing populations.	7 clips: (1) "Tokens Turning Farms Smart"; (2) "AI for Harvest Plenty"; (3-7) Bites on sims for crop yields in sovereignty-challenged areas.	1. FarmBeats (Microsoft: IoT twins for small farms); 2. CropX (soil data sovereignty); 3. John Deere See & Spray (precision ag app); 4. AgriDigital (blockchain for food chains); 5. IBM Food Trust (traceability hacks); 6. Blue River Tech (weed detection); 7. PlantVillage (AI disease ID); 8. FAO Aquastat (global water twins); 9. Gro Intelligence (market data); 10. xFarm (EU sovereignty focus); 11. AgriTask (co-hack with Israeli farms); 12. Sentera (drone analytics). Focus: Co-hack yield twins with Indian/Saudi communities facing water sovereignty.
3. Health Innovations with Agentic AI	From VivaTech & Citadel: AI for proteins/cells; agentic tools for cures, trials, and precision health.	9 clips: (1) "AI Unraveling Life's Code"; (2) "Agentic Cures"; (3-9) Snaps on MONAI imaging and genomics.	1. MONAI (NVIDIA: Medical imaging twins); 2. Parabricks (genomics sequencing); 3. AlphaFold (DeepMind: Protein folding); 4. PathAI (disease detection); 5. Tempus (oncology data); 6. HealthTwin (personal health sims); 7. Fitbit API (wearable hacks); 8. Open mHealth (sovereign data schemas); 9. Ada Health (symptom checker); 10. Epic MyChart (EHR twins); 11. Babylon Health (AI consultations); 12. Nightingale (biomarker apps). Focus: Twin community health datasets with UAE peers for sovereignty in genomics.
4. AI for K-12 Teachers & Students	From COMPUTEX & GTC Paris: Democratize AI education; DGX Spark for students/researchers to build models.	10 clips: (1) "AI in Every Classroom"; (2) "Student AI Factories"; (3-10) Tips for agentic learning tools.	1. DGX Spark (NVIDIA: Student AI dev); 2. Code.org (AI coding basics); 3. Scratch AI (MIT: Visual twins); 4. Teachable Machine (Google: No-code ML); 5. AI4K12 (curriculum hacks); 6. ClassDojo (teacher apps); 7. Khan Academy AI (personalized); 8. Duolingo Max (language agents); 9. Canva Magic (design twins); 10. Minecraft Education (sim worlds); 11. Perplexity Kids (safe search); 12. Nemotron (sovereign models). Focus: Co-hack lesson twins with Singapore/India educators on data privacy.
6. Data Sovereignty Challenges	From Citadel & VivaTech: Sovereign AI models; keep data national to build custom intelligence.	8 clips: (1) "Own Your Data Stack"; (2) "Sovereign Models"; (3-8) Hacks for local control.	1. Nemotron (NVIDIA: Local LLMs); 2. Hugging Face Spaces (model twins); 3. Databricks (data lakes); 4. Snowflake (secure shares); 5. Vault (HashiCorp: Secrets); 6. Keycloak (identity sovereignty); 7. MinIO (S3-compatible storage); 8. Nextcloud (self-hosted files); 9. Proton Drive (encrypted); 10. Signal (secure comms); 11. Mastodon (federated social); 12. Solid (TimBL: Personal data pods). Focus: Co-hack with EU/India on GDPR-like challenges via summits.
7. Robotics & Physical AI in Daily Life	From CES & GTC March: Physical AI for robots; address labor shortages with agentic embodiments.	9 clips: (1) "Robots as AI Bodies"; (2) "Agentic Helpers"; (3-9) Sims for community bots.	1. Isaac GR00T (NVIDIA: Robot twins); 2. ROS (Robot OS); 3. Gazebo (simulator); 4. CoppeliaSim (robotics hacks); 5. Webots (open sim); 6. MuJoCo (physics engine); 7. Arduino IDE (hardware twins); 8. Raspberry Pi OS (edge bots); 9. Home Assistant (smart home agents); 10. IFTTT (automation); 11. Zapier (no-code agents); 12. Make (integrations). Focus: Twin bots with Japan/Korea for aging community sovereignty.
8. Agentic AI for Community Projects	From COMPUTEX & Citadel: Onboard AI as digital employees; CC agents on projects for reasoning.	10 clips: (1) "CC Your AI Team"; (2) "50 Projects Quarterly"; (3-10) Agent hacks for locals.	1. NVIDIA NIMs (agent microservices); 2. Cursor (AI coding); 3. Perplexity (research agents); 4. Replicate (model runs); 5. LangChain (agent chains); 6. CrewAI (multi-agent); 7. AutoGen (Microsoft: Collab agents); 8. Grok API (xAI: Query twins); 9. OpenAI Assistants; 10. Anthropic Claude Projects; 11. GitHub Copilot; 12. Notion AI (project twins). Focus: Co-hack agents with global millennials on sovereignty via India's AI Summit.

This MOOC could launch as a prototype on grok.com or X, evolving into those Jensen AI agents you described—users CCing them for on-the-fly help, like "EnergyAgent, twin my solar setup with a Saudi peer." If you provide a full speech catalog or refine topics/apps, I can iterate!

[e-mail] : Of course the request could be made of anyone exciting AI 2026eg many of musk's compasses are as exciting as Huang's but as i will be 75 in july i dont think i can keep up with earthlings needs in space whilst communities i see every day with needs of intelligence app actions

More at neumann752.docx